User talk:Dis-info

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -zappa.jak e (talk) 07:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Dis-info! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:46, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Bill McGarry (Internet advocate) -

Proposed deletion of Misc.handicap


The article Misc.handicap has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Nearly all Usenet discussion groups are plainly non-notable, this one included. Written in 2006 by user who looks to have a conflict of interest. Article gives no evidence that subject meets WP:GNG or WP:WEB. A Google News search yields no results. A normal Google search yields no notability-confirming sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Half  Price  13:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bill McGarry (Internet advocate)


The article Bill McGarry (Internet advocate) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Written in 2006 by user who looks to have a conflict of interest. Article gives no evidence that subject meets WP:GNG or WP:BIO. A suitable Google search yields nothing but Wikiscrapes. All "Bill McGarry" news results belong to the footballer of the same name.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Half  Price  13:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Bill McGarry (Internet advocate) for deletion
The article Bill McGarry (Internet advocate) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bill McGarry (Internet advocate) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.