User talk:Disappearing123

June 2012
Please do not delete or flag potential "spoilers" in Wikipedia articles, as you did in the article Impaled (illusion). It is generally expected that the subjects of Wikipedia articles will be covered in detail, and giving a section a title such as "Plot" or "Ending" is considered sufficient warning to the reader that the text will contain revelations about the narrative. Deleting such information makes the article less useful for a reader who is specifically trying to find out more about the subject. For more information, see Wikipedia's guidelines on spoilers. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:01, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I am not removing anything but the lines describing secrets to these effects. I am a Magician and I own many of the illusions being exposed in these articles. Many of these illusions also hold patents and by law should not be exposed. And My post in sideshow was simply a bit of history about the oldest and longest running show out there. Ward Hall is the King of the sideshow and I was surprised he was not mentioned in the post, he is simply a friend and I was not trying to promote him, I was simply adding a bit of history.

Disappearing123
 * Hi. You may have noticed that this is an encyclopedia. Encyclopediae are here to provide information, and provide it we do, as long as we are able to source that information to a reliable source. While I'm sorry that you feel we're ruining your business, we are an encyclopedia and we do not exist to serve the business interests of those who wish we wouldn't provide information. Nor do we exist to advertise for businesses, friends, or shows. Please consider this your final warning that continuing to remove content from Wikipedia because you wish people didn't know it is considered disruptive, and may result in your editing privileges being removed. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I might also point out that when information is patented, it becomes publicly available. I strongly suggest that you read our article on intellectual rights to magic methods. DS (talk) 18:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC)