User talk:Discipulus1001/sandbox

Wiki Comments: 5 criteria
Comments on each of the five criteria for 2 articles 1. A lead section that is easy to understand 2. A clear structure 3. Balanced coverage 4. Neutral content 5. Reliable sources

1. Lead Section: Can be more clear by: Link technical terms like "Stand-by-loans" to other wiki pages. Does "1940,0 millions SDR" mean 1,940 million SDR? Can the lead section show how World Bank Intervention in the past has affected the current Hungary.

2. Clear Structure: May want to have a table of content in order to be easier to read. Also link to other wikipedia articles so that it is easier to read. The History part seems more complete than the Present section of the wikipedia article.

3. Balanced Coverage: Seemed to put more emphasize on the History but the Present section looks incomplete. Additionally cite where you found your source on when Hungary joined the AIIB. You talk about the neighboring countries so give a brief layout on who these countries are and what their stats are. Finish up the Present section page looks awkward right and just has brief unstructured facts.

4. Neutral Content: Maybe not say "promising" but show how the economy has changed over the times. "leading to a significant" I would cut; shows tone of voice a bit. Some countries may have more cuts.

5. Reliable Source: Good sources all seem reliable, but should cite some things like when Hungary joined the AIIB.

Jinkim28 (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Jinkim28

1. The end of the introduction should read "was paid back in 2013". As mentioned above you should add links to other wikipedia pages.

2. In the history section it was unclear to me when the IMF first intervened in Hungary's economy. The "Present" section is very incomplete. You seem to jump from having some type of IMF intervention, and then to all the loans are piad off. There isn't much about what happened inbetween. Lacking embedded links.

3. The AIIB does not have anything to do with the IMF. I would omit this from the Wikipedia page. You could try to talk about some of the IMF assesments such as the DETAILED ASSESSMENT OFSTANDARDS AND CODES— ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COMBATING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM

4.I would try to define some terms such as "dangerously rising" and "promising growth". Possibly add numbers to these claims so that they are supported.

5. You seem to have reliale sources. I would try to delve deepwe into the IMF website and pull some information from their reports.

Tyler12gilbert (talk) 19:49, 6 December 2018 (UTC)