User talk:Discocorco

February 2022
Hello, I'm MPFitz1968. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. MPFitz1968 (talk) 22:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Arpil 24
Please read wp:editwar. Slatersteven (talk) 09:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Graham Hancock. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Harryhenry1 (talk) 09:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC) Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slatersteven (talk) 09:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Graham Hancock. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)