User talk:Discodave1889

Welcome!
Hello, Discodave1889, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Killamarsh, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 11:16, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm EdwardUK. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Killamarsh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. EdwardUK (talk) 01:34, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Killamarsh, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. EdwardUK (talk) 13:59, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Your edits to Killamarsh
Please stop adding the same material to Killamarsh without supplying sources for the information. You should add reliable sources for any information that you add to articles. Further disruptive editing will result in you been blocked from editing.

Keith D (talk) 18:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Killamarsh, you may be blocked from editing. EdwardUK (talk) 20:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Killamarsh. EdwardUK (talk) 20:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Killamarsh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. EdwardUK (talk) 11:31, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

World renowned ferret clubs
Could you supply examples of this ferret club being mentioned on other continents? Discuss it on the talk page. Wikipedia is world-renowned and wants to stay that way. Victuallers (talk) 11:38, 13 July 2021 (UTC) I have blocked you for 48 hours, Have a think about this and look at other similar articles and look for best practice. You will find other people and clubs claiming to be world renowned..... but if you look at the ones that are world renowned then they rarely mention it. If they do, then there is a reference to back it up - written by someone who is not involved. Victuallers (talk) 11:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. EdwardUK (talk) 22:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Killamarsh. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Keith D (talk) 22:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Killamarsh - The Cock Inn on the High Street
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Killamarsh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. EdwardUK (talk) 02:11, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

3 month block
The continued addition of the unsourced ferret club text indicates that you are not taking on board what is being asked. Think about it. Victuallers (talk) 10:28, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 45745
has been closed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 11:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Killamarsh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EdwardUK (talk) 12:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Killamarsh, you may be blocked from editing. EdwardUK (talk) 21:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Killamarsh. EdwardUK (talk) 16:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Next block will be indef
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC)