User talk:DisconsolatePutz

Hello, I'm Moriwen. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, United Against Nuclear Iran, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Moriwen (talk) 15:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Masih Alinejad, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Be advised that I am bound by the editorial strictures of Wikipedia, and consequently, I do not believe I am in breach of any terms governing edits to pages. Apropos the content I modified, be advised that none of it constitutes my personal opinion, for such developments are already clarified and established. She works as a presenter for a US Government-funded broadcaster, something I punctiliously lodged on that page considering the fact that her views/opinions might be colored or distorted owing to the jingoistic aspirations of the US State Department. Refrain from undoing my edits, thanks. DisconsolatePutz (talk) 07:32, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi DisconsolatePutz! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 09:53, 3 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Refer to the aforementioned note of mine on the maelstrom. This has nothing to do with intellectual disagreements, but rather, an established fact that pays no obeisance to any ideological leaning. Thanks. DisconsolatePutz (talk) 13:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * And youre welcome to think that, but that is not how it works on this site. See also WP:POV, WP:BLP and WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at United Against Nuclear Iran shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Czello (music) 07:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Mark Wallace shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Czello (music) 09:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Can you please cease being obtuse and describing my legitimate attempts at reversing semantic obscurantism as an instance of "edit-warring"? Check the footnote describing the changes I made: the page has already been flagged for hosting self-promotional, self-aggrandizing content, owing to which it is incumbent that we address and remedy the concerns.
 * Secondly, the usage of the term "regime" instead of "government" to describe the governments of the nations described therein constitutes a blatant contravention of the neutrality policy. All the changes I have been have been substantiated with cogent sources, whereas the previous edits were not merely unreferenced, but were brazenly espousing a partisan stance.
 * Please refrain from engaging in the aforementioned or I shall be compelled to take this up further. DisconsolatePutz (talk) 10:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You're edit warring against multiple editors on multiple articles. When you're reverted the best course of action is to take it up at the talk page per WP:BRD. I've yet to see you do so. — Czello (music) 10:16, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Multiple? I only come across two editors collaborating with each in a concerted attempt to subvert changes: HistoryofIran and Mikecaymantrades. You can cease painting this maelstrom arising out of the concerns of "multiple" people.
 * As I stated earlier, the content previously hosted on the pages I edited were either unsubstantiated, unreferenced, self-promotional, or were blatantly pushing a distorted perspective. If you suggest reverting to the previous edition, cite the references. As an editor, I am well within my rights to suggest changes backed by credible references, which I did. Moreover, if the content infringes on Wikipedia's policy, then it shall be rectified and addressed for due compliance. This is the only concern I am willing to discuss and I hope you reserve your line of enquiries to this. DisconsolatePutz (talk) 10:25, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. — Czello (music) 10:20, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 12:52, 4 August 2023 (UTC)