User talk:Discoqueen12

Era styles on Wikipedia
Hello, Discoqueen12. I've reverted your wholesale, undiscussed change of era style at Augustus. Similar changes made by you have been reverted by other editors, at Emperor Gaozu of Han and other articles. Please see WP:ERA, and please don't forget to provide edit summaries to explain any substantive or stylistic changes you make to articles. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 08:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Arbitrary changes of BC/AD to BCE/CE
I've reverted your changes to "Battle of Mutina", "Romulus", and "Han Dynasty". These edits were made in violation of a well-established policy, WP:ERA, which states, in relevant part:
 * Do not change the established era style in an article unless there are reasons specific to its content. Seek consensus on the talk page before making the change. Open the discussion under a subhead that uses the word "era". Briefly state why the style is inappropriate for the article in question. A personal or categorical preference for one era style over the other is not justification for making a change.

It doesn't appear that any such consensus was reached, and there doesn't seem to be any particular reason specific to the content of each article for doing so. Each article consistently used BC/AD before the change. Evidently all or nearly all of your contributions to Wikipedia seem to involve changing BC/AD to BCE/CE, and all of them have been reverted by various editors following the WP:ERA guideline. I recommend you familiarize yourself with this and other Wikipedia policies, think about why these edits have been controversial, and perhaps refocus your energy on some other aspect of Wikipedia where you can work collaboratively with other editors to improve the content of articles, without coming into conflict with other editors or Wikipedia policies. P Aculeius (talk) 12:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)