User talk:Disliker of humanities

''NOTE THAT I AM USUALLY EXTREMELY INACTIVE THROUGHOUT THE WEEK, SO DO NOT EXPECT A REPLY BEFORE THE WEEKEND

Things that will result in a templated warning once I see them include

 * 1) Uncivil comments.
 * 2) Bad faith comments.
 * 3) Personal attacks.
 * 4) Posts that bite my newcomer status.
 * 5) False asumptions.
 * 6) Vandalism (results in a level 4im warning if you haven't already had one).
 * Hiya. Before you give anyone templates for stuff here, you might want to read this: WP:DTTR. [ roux  ] [ x ] was prince of canada 15:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It doesn't much matter what anyone else has done. Each of us is responsible for following policies and guidelines. The point of not templating the regulars is that we should try to engage in productive conversation, especially when someone has been around for a while. [ roux  ] [ x ] was prince of canada 15:59, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Things that will result in a non-templated warning once I see them include

 * 1) Comments about my prejudice towards spelling resulting in having a sharp tongue towards it. You may find this user's comments on foul language useful.

My archives

 * /Help
 * /Concern

Insulting edit summaries on Zine
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. --Closeapple (talk) 10:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Helpme

 * Please click here: ClueBot. [ roux  ] [ x ] was prince of canada 15:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * or User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo Gtstricky Talk or C 15:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

No, I meant actually running the bot through my account.
 * You need approval at the Bot Approval Group. [ roux  ] [ x ] was prince of canada 17:23, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * They look fine to me. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:13, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Your edit summary here is completely unacceptable. You know this, because you had already been warned about language like that in an edit summary. This isn't really acceptable either. '' [ roux  ] [ x ] was prince of canada 18:33, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Tom Sayle (3rd nomination) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Tombomp (talk/contribs) 07:12, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry I can't understand the unblock reason above, can someone explain it?
 * The next admin who reviews your block can explain it more clearly. Please don't use the helpme template for this. Thank you. [ roux  ] [ x ] was prince of canada 19:21, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * You admit that you " tried the same password for his account as his sockpuppet account that I had compromised". So you admit that you have tried to hack another users password? You can take the rest of everything else and throw it out the window. For that reason only, you should never be allowed to edit wikipedia... --Jayron32. talk . contribs 19:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)