User talk:Disneyana

Rotting Flesh Radio
Hi. I think you are the author of this aticle? You are certainly a major contributor. I imagine you wish it to survive the deletion nomination. Do seek to ensure that it survives may I suggest you revist the nomination and format your response as Keep if that is what you wish. There is also substantial work to do on the article to prevent it from being deleted "as a matter of course" because the format is unreadable. There is no guarantee that it will survive, but it will stand a better chance if you follow the style guidelines more closely. Fiddle Faddle 16:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Rottingfleshradio.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rottingfleshradio.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 17:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Rotting Flesh Radio for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rotting Flesh Radio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rotting Flesh Radio (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 20:31, 4 October 2012 (UTC)