User talk:Dispenser/Archive 1

Tnavbar-header
Your latest changes breaks usage in some pages.

Please see this test page for samples that use this template, and either fix or revert your changes please. // Laughing Man 17:41, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you going to attempt to fix the template? // Laughing Man 18:03, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Template:Fruits Basket characters...
Sorry, I didn't mean to undermine the work you put into making the color scheme and text layout of that Fruits Basket navigation template to resemble that of a standard navigation box. Honest! :P I changed the table class back to "toccolours" and readded certain HTML tags because having it set to "navbox" gave the box literally no formatting when viewed in Firefox (e.g., the text was aligned to the left, the font sizes were all the same, and there were no colors; it was a bunch of black and white text with blue links). When I said it was "ugly to Firefox users", I wasn't judging the color scheme or whatnot based on personal taste, rather I was talking about the complete absence of formatting the template had when viewed in Firefox. (Though, it could very well have been a problem only on my Firefox. I didn't actually check it on a different computer.)

I didn't at the time, however, notice that when I manually "fixed" the box, it looked different than it did before you began editing it, so thanks for fixing that... Hrm, in retrospect, perhaps the best course of action would to have been to simply revert it back to a previous state... :/ Anyway, sorry if I offended you, and sorry that I wasn't clear with my intention in editing the template. I changed the template so that it more closely resembles how it is intended to look in IE. Feel free to further improve it if you see fit.

--Fnar(talk) 02:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Template
Regarding your recent edits, please note that Bone is mainly a comic book series and not a computer and video games one.-- TBC Φ  talk?  08:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Fann Wong navboxes
Thanks loads for helping me create the template! I'll know what to do in the future. Thanks again! Voda voda 07:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Template:Navbox generic
Hi Dispenser, Thanks for updating the above so it features both v·d·e and [show]/[hide]; request you swap their positions so they appear per Navigation etc...? Regards, David Kernow (talk) 02:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I would but the [show]/[hide] link is hard coded (line 305) in the site wide javascript with the relavent section (Collapsible tables) maintained by User:R. Koot. I'm not sure what the reasoning behind it being by default of the left side.  Personally in my eye it makes more sense for the v-d-e to float on the right as it matches the section edit links style. --Dispenser 03:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for this information; I'll contact R. Koot. Re v·d·e on the right, I think I'd argue that more folk probably make more use of the [show]/[hide] feature, so, like the [edit] links, let's position that there instead...? Yours, David (talk) 11:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Approved for AWB!
Thank you for your recent application to use AutoWikiBrowser. I have approved your request and you should now be able to use the AWB application. Be sure to check every edit before you save it, and don't forget to check out the AWB Guide. You can get any help you need over on the AWB talk page. Feel free to contact me with any questions, alphachimp  23:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Moon and solar system footers
Hi. Would it be possible to make these footers collapse to a single line, as opposed to two lines? Also, is there a way to set the default as to whether the footer is initially open or collapsed? For the Moon footer, under most situations, think that it would be best to have this by default open.Lunokhod 00:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking care of the navigation footers. One small comment: it might be more aesthetically pleasing if the "hide" link were a smaller font size. Thanks again... Lunokhod 19:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Template request
Hi. Thanks for updating a bunch of Templates earlier today. If you have a moment, could you also work your magic on Template:William S. Burroughs? Thanks! 23skidoo 04:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Good idea about creating a template for the NovelsWikiproject. I'm not one of the members "in charge" of the project, so maybe you can post the suggestion to its forum? User:Kevinalewis appears to be leading the charge on the WikiProject so you could also put the suggestion to him, too. Cheers! 23skidoo 13:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Navigation Template help
I've started working on the navigation template for CFB. This is just for feasibility testing for now, to show that it can be done what what the results will look like, as there was some apprehension about creating our own meta-template just for the project. Your help would be greatly appreciated: Template:CFB navbox. Thank you. -- MECU ≈ talk 18:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You are amazing! I've added the PSU problem example, and it's working good, except for the show/hide which still doesn't work with the background dark like that, and the white dropshadow looks very funny. If you could fix that one problem, I think it would be finished. Thank you, again, very much for your work! -- MECU ≈ talk 21:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm giving up hope for the show/hide. Is it possible to just get the VDE with the template as is? Basically, take what exists and remove the show/hide function and we'll have a winner? Thanks. -- MECU ≈ talk 21:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Reply/question
Just letting you know that I left a comment/question regarding your reversion on the talk page for Template talk:Keyboard keys. Templationist 13:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Infobox Journal without name parameter
What did you have in mind with Category:Infobox Journal without name parameter ? I cant find any references to it anywhere. John Vandenberg 04:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Request for Participation in Universal Animation AfD Debate
Need more participation to reach consensus in Universal Animation (AfD). Echocharlie 15:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Template:Navbox generic, passing thought
Hi again Dispenser, Thanks for maintaining the above; your recent reversion, however, seems to've rendered the show/hide link ineffective and the box permanently collapsed (!) ...or do I need to purge something...? False alarm; my error while testing. Sorry!

I was thinking of proposing that either the Navigation or Navbox generic format was phased out in favor of the other, for the sake of: Do you think this idea would make any headway...? Thanks, David Kernow (talk) 05:13, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) consistency in multiple templates' appearance (e.g. in articles about countries);
 * 2) avoiding situations where X templates of one kind are autocollapsed, but one or two of the other kind remain shown.


 * ''I'm doubt that ether template needs be phased out. From the recent comments Ruud, he may rewrite the whole thing in the future...
 * Intriguing!


 * ''...It should be very possible to also add a third function to the commons.js file that counts all the tables and navdivs and then collapses them, instead of doing it for each set. While on this note, the autocollapse value is set rather low.
 * I'm beginning to wonder that any collapsible template's default might best be collapsed, regardless of how many others there may be on the page... I realize, though, that I'm considering templates at the end of articles on countries or their subdivisions; elsewhere, a blanket default of collapsed may indeed be inappropriate.


 * There is, though, the inconsistency when (say) three Navigation-based templates next to each other autocollapse, while the single Navbox generic template following them (or nestling between two of them) doesn't collapse; sometimes I think this can look a little odd, or promote the uncollapsed template without good reason.


 * ''As for consistency, I believe that this is more of a wikiproject problem. If we had only created one meta-navbox there would still be great inconstancy, as the guide line for amount and style of information in a navbox is typically set upon by the project...
 * Apologies; I realize my comment wasn't sufficiently clear. Rather than variation in how templates' contents are presented, I was thinking of the inconsistency described above and the difference in appearance between NavFrame's (Navigation et al) and class="navbox"'s (Navbox generic et al) presentation of basic elements (frame, titlebar, background color, etc). Regards, David (talk) 18:40, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Japan train templates
FYI, you should be careful when putting PAGENAME in the pipe of a category. Sometimes, the pagename should not be used, due to unicode "alphabet order" issues. (Tōk is after Tu, even though the wikipedia standard is to sort it as if it was Tok (no macron over the o)). I noticed it in this edit, and there are others as well. Most of the other changes look fine. Just a note for the future if you write a similar bot. Neier 13:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Template talk:Tnavbar-collapsible
Hey! i noticed you created the collapsible navbar. I've posted a suggestion there. I can't program it, but thought since you created it that you might be able to have a crack at it. Thanks.

-- linca linca  07:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)


 * It can't be done with this template. The collapsing statement  needs to appear in the opening tag of the table.  If you want that particular template's collapsibility to be set on a per-page bases use  . —Dispenser 18:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry if i seem like an idiot, but are you suggesting that for each implementation of the template, I use  in the template itself. how would I set up the variableon the page when I'm displaying it. For instance, for Billy Joel albums if on The Stranger I want it expanded, but on Category:Billy Joel albums I want it collapsed, how would I implement that?
 * Again, sorry for being a pain. Once I know it, I won't bother you. ;)
 * -- linca linca  23:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Inline Templates invite
Given your editing pattern, I believe you belong here. — SMcCandlish &#91;talk&#93; &#91;cont&#93;   ‹(-¿-)› 23:18, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Band templates
Regarding standardization into collapsible navboxes or NavFrames, you may be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians. –Pomte 19:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Red Hot Chili Peppers Template
When you cleaned up the template, it made a definitive change. The font is now clearly far larger then before. Could you, if possible, restore the font size to its original state? Regards, N SR 77  ( Talk 00:06, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

TOC formating problems
re: Use for this. && TOCright/doc
 * Sorry, you're wrong

Is NOT the effect this gives nor is the one desired. (It would help if you'd asked me about it, or saw the places it was used TOCnestright, or even had the sense to see that it'd just been created. As it is, CBD hasn't had time to advise me on it's next incarnation yet! Then again, see the comments on the TFD. Besides being wrong about how clear works versus this, you certainly aren't thinking of the average editors needs. // Fra nkB 08:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Is this really necessary
Re: This sort of pollution in article space is hardly necessary when you jumped on this before it was even out of the birth canal! Please consider leaving the article space clean, while we sort this out on TFD, there is no reason to air our dirty laundry and junk up articles... it's not like there are many of us that know about the 3-4 pages it's been used on so far, and whether you like it or not, the closing admin will be well advised to subst it in place. Also, please note, I pick up my own dirty socks... and on the rare occasions when I can't get something polished into a general tool, will also db-author a template that's not working. Per Pomte and me own reasoning, having a template without parameters is much better than one that needs special knowledge. Cheers. // Fra nkB 15:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Being script savvy
Seeing as you are savvy on scripts and presumably .css and browser interactions, how about a little co-operative effort on the general TOC positoning problem I'm trying to solve for the many pages with long right side infoboxes, et. al., ad nauseum. Note, I could care less whether we solve the problem with my new TOCnestright, or with params in TOCright, but only that we solve the general problem for the many wiki pages which can use and in some cases, definitely need it.

Please see (Must see differing behavior in both MSIE and another browser, I'm using Firefox (FF) on that).   
 * Recollect, the key control element is:


 * - Concept "control" trial -- TOC positioned slightly down in introduction text, floated right against the busy right margin elements. Seems to be working fine in FF and IE.
 * Daulatabad - Positioned in IE7, looks poor in Firefox
 * History_of_chemistry - (subst'd trial) Positioned in Firefox, floats up and expands out in IE6/7, but at least doesn't look poorly anywhere.
 * Timeline_of_chemistry - Simple element on right enables a more or less identical presentation on FF and IE browsers.
 * succesion of changes wherein several of us have failed. Something in the infobox/TOCnestright templates interactions causes the FF attempt to appear nice, yet creates a huge area of blank space (nearly a full screen page) offset in the IE page views when placed in the best position, or in alternative methods, has the TOC position dependent upon (apparently the upper edge of) the image below the infobox. (I haven't yet ruled out that there may be an open div exiting the infobox.)
 * diff && Kingdom of Aksum -- The direct inspiration for the template version. Note this infobox works fine beside the guts of the template despite it's length.
 * More of a challenge -- note this attempt to tidy the long TOC was a table. (The related edit above (Axum) gave me the idea of trying a div solution.) ... Same page the new template, working fine (so far).
 * '''A More typical need ... a busy page (Note FA status as in above): Battle of Jutland table solution, && Quick try today: Battle_of_Jutland.
 * Also: Battle_of_Arras

So inasmuch as I'm gonna complain your discussion changes in the TOCright/doc page are still way to techy written and far too unclear to someone without a background in the topic, perhaps you'd care to demonstrate an equivilent application of your parameters which will and can replace my evoloving TOCnestright? Bottom line, I suck at HTML, and know css only as something to swear at. By the same token, it is not something that can be mentioned as part of usage either... we have to assume people using the default skin and any browser when writing any page!!! For that reason, I don't and won't ever add extensions to my browsers--I want to see what the customer-users are getting/seeing -- so far as my own fonts and size starting parameters let me! So you up for the challenge... this is a worthwhile problem to solve.

In particular that Bharuch interaction with that infobox has defeated me and David Kernow, so we'd appreciate it if you can beat it in some way... just so we can learn what is causing the aberrant behavior. Thanks // Fra nkB 19:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

New TOC question

 * What the heck does the limit parameter do on Template:TOCright, Template:TOCleft ?
 * FYI a general and easy solution for the float problem is provided by the mult-mode FixHTML. See for example use in Ronald Reagan (at least half a dozen places. Thanks // Fra nkB 11:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Sigh
To add insult to injury, check out the recent history of, whereas of a moment ago in this edit Firefox is locating TOCleft in the next section below where the box appears for/in IE7 where I applied it.

Note also the related discussion on (really from  down) with respect to very different effects using other browser combinations, which have lead me to conclude the various TOC templates are far less robust and universally useful than desired, as the underlying interaction behind wikicoding as implemented by the browsers is interpreted quite differently. Any ideas as to how that {TOCleft} could be anchored as well? To sum it up, what works in IE6/7 fails a significant percentage of the time in Firefox and vice versa. Add in the apparent differences one has reported in Netscape 8.1, and things look to be fairly messy. In short, things aren't robust so far as I can see in any of these TOC templates. I'm open to suggestions as to how to pursue this general issue. // Fra nkB 14:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

For this Thanks! Your table on the right as well as this technique seem to work fine per more recent experimentation. Cheers! // Fra nkB 07:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Taj Mahal TOC
Hi Dispenser. Liked what you did with the Daulatbad TOC. Can you have a look at Taj Mahal and suggest improvements? It's butt-ugly imo. --Nemonoman 22:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Note
Why did you remove commas from the US patent template? — Omegatron 06:13, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Template:Telsigs
Seems like the changes to Template:Telsigs causes the links to show up above the "Telephony Signals" heading - such as on Reorder tone. MeekMark 02:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Convert a couple boxes?
If you get a chance, can you convert Template: Epcot attractions & Template: Disneymgm to use the nav box like you did with the other Disney templates? -- blm07 01:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! -- blm07 01:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Two template related proposals
Hi, I thought you might be interested in --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 11:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Promote the use of multilevel templates
 * Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Template test subpage(s)

Tnavbar
heyo! i'll see how the tnavbar template works with the rest of the coding, and i'll implement it if there are no issues with it. I only use the current tnavbar system because it's relatively problem-free and fits with other formatting.  RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk''' 10:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

International Criminal Law template
Since your last edit, the v·d·e links don't work, the columns are very wide and the link to the International criminal law article is gone. I'm not sure why you did this so I'm not reverting. Sideshow Bob Roberts 02:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your quick response! Sideshow Bob Roberts 02:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: New keywords (AWB)
Hi, Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Feature_requests - Would be useful for a bit of extra input :)

Thanks!

Reedy Boy 11:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. I found it! Added the %%titlename%% and the namespace one for you :) Reedy Boy 12:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Template:UCSB
Hi. I noticed that you used a script to modify a member of one of the two sets of eccentrically modified versions of the .tocolours template design that I put together for use on articles related to several dozen western US colleges affiliated with UC, CSU, OUS, UH, and UA. I'm amazed that your script managed to retain as much fidelity to my original version of UCSB's template as it did. However, there are a couple things that did not come through in the new version, and I am wondering how to fix them. I am not a coder; I had to figure out how .tocolours worked by trial and error, and I might as well ask someone who actually knows what he or she is doing this time before I start tearing things apart to see how they work.

The two major things that don't look quite right are that the new hide button is not taking on the color of the rest of the headline text, though the v,d,e manages to do so, and the subheadings appear as they do on the generic navbox, with the lavendar-box backgrounds and black text, rather than with the clear backgrounds and grey text the navbox used for subheadings before. Please let me know if it is possible to make these things work in the new template format.

Also, please take a look at Template:University of Hawaii, an example of my other series of templates. Though it probably grates against your standardization push, I find that configuration works well for readers as their eyes scan down the page from top to bottom and left to right, and it's visually-pleasing besides. Is that type of template, also based on .tocolours, as amenable to faithful conversion as the UC and UA templates, which are all laid out like UCSB's? If not, is there a way to convert it to be closer to your standard while still retaining its layout? I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks. --Dynaflow  babble  19:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Judging from this, the script-based conversion doesn't work as well on the UH-type modified tempates mentioned above. I've reverted Template:Oregon University System until we can figure out how to make it work in the new scheme of things.  Is there a way to convert the template in such a way that it collapses downwards?   --Dynaflow   babble  19:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The primary purpose of the script is to improve the code so more of the articles validate as XHTML strict. Along the way I add niceties as collapsible and v-d-e and using appropriate CSS classes to allow macro navbox management.  Now as for the issues you brought up.  Collapsible only works on the &lt;th&gt;/! cell in the first row.  Because the link color is unchangeable (since it's added via JavaScript) and may blend into the background, I've turned off the autocollapsible functional.  For the UH-type navbox, I've having trouble figuring out where to place the v-d-e.  The collapsible isn't a big deal and wouldn't work without heading cell.  Cheers, Dispenser 20:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the quick reply. Keeping with my intended purpose for the UH-type navbox layout -- moving the less sought-after (though still important) links and text to the bottom and far right of the templates while still having a highly visible visual marker spanning left-hand margin -- I think the v,d,e should probably be aligned at the far right end of the bottom title bar.  One more thing I noticed with the UCSB template convrsion while I'm here: The conversion script doesn't seem to make an allowance for centering a second line of text.  I'm not sure exactly how to fix that elegantly, but maybe you could give me a suggestion so that I can do touch-up as you move through the UC and UA templates.  Thanks again.   --Dynaflow   babble  21:11, 23 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I've updated Oregon University System the font-size was rather troublesome to convert properly since you were using fixed units. As for that other thing, it seems to be a bug in the tnavbar-collapsible template as it render the left float two pixel taller than the right float.  While I had know about this before this is the first time its actually producible.  If you want a hack you can either change the font so the second line lies either in between or bellow both floats or use &lt;br clear="all"/&gt; to force the second line bellow the floats.  —Dispenser 00:55, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your work on the OUS template. It looks great. As far as I know, there are only a few other templates like it floating around currently, unless someone, somewhere, made off with the design and retrofitted it for his or her own purposes. The ones I put together are: University of Hawaii, California State University, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, and San Diego State University. There are also the following templates which were done like UCSB's: University of California, University of California, Berkeley, UC Davis, UCLA, University of California, Riverside, University of California, San Diego, University of California, Santa Cruz, and University of Alaska System. If you would do the basic conversion tasks on those templates, I could probably do the touch-up work, using your conversions of Oregon University System and UCSB as guides. Thanks. --Dynaflow  babble  21:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * My designs seem to have been migrating. The second link I clicked in the United States education navigational boxes category was this: American University.  I'm going to check through the other university templates to see who else is using my layouts, watchlist them, fix them up when you come around to them with your conversion script.   --Dynaflow   babble  22:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No need to do that, just tell me the categories where you think the design's been copied and I'll add it to the list. And a side question why did you change the color codes back to their six digit equivalents?   —Dispenser 22:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * They're all probably going to be in Category:United States education navigational boxes. I guess the six-digit color codes don't matter terribly much for UCSB's navbox, but there are others I have done with very specific colors.  I have tried to use institutional identity standards documents to make the navboxes the exact, official colors of each school, and I have found those defined only in six-digit hex and in Pantone, which I converted into six-digit hex codes as well as I could.  Is there a technical reason you're limiting the colors to three digits, like making an allowance for displays with lower color depth and such?  I would test the color-depth thing myself, but ater de-FUBAR'ing my xorg.conf file once, I don't relish playing around my display settings again anytime soon for anything but the most pressing reasons.  If there's a reason to switch the colors back to three digits, I'll change them back.  The "clear all" hack worked to center the text in the second line of the title bar, by the way.  Thanks for the hint.  =)   --Dynaflow   babble  23:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The six-to-three is just shorthand, #ABC is the same as #AABBCC. I've gone throught most of the templates in that category expect for about a dozen or so, so I'll finish that up now.  —Dispenser 23:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for all your work; everything looks great. I only see a couple of weirdnesses that I haven't been able to sort out while doing my touch-ups. Specifically, University of California, Santa Cruz and UC Davis seem to be having problems with their images, displaying lavendar outlines where there should just be a transparent background. Do I just have images of the wrong dimensions, or am I missing something obvious? {EDIT:] There also seems to be a little bit of rogue code visible on University of California, San Diego that I can't figure out how to get rid of (maybe it's the lateness of the hour). --Dynaflow  babble  08:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Template:Opera genres
This is to explain that I have reverted your change to this box. The reason is that it follows the Opera Project colour coding and is listed by consensus on the Project page. In any case there really is no reason why these boxes have to conform to someone else's design - WP looks better if tere is some aesthetic variety. Have a nice day! -- Kleinzach 02:03, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I'm using Safari. No-one has ever said this appears strange but do suggest a different way of specifying the colour if you like. Perhaps you can show me an example? -- Kleinzach 02:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I've just seen the revised boxes. They look good. Thanks for keeping the colour scheme. -- Kleinzach 03:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Category:Naval navigational boxes
You should probably add Category:Naval navigational boxes instead of the non-existant Category:Ships navigational boxes to those ship templates. . Thanks. --Dual Freq 01:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

666 Satan Nav Box
yo, i reverted the edit you made to the 666 Satan Nav Box as there was no reason to make it so large and it was ok as it was prior to being changed... if you feel that what i did was a mistake then please feel free to message me and we can discuss this... thanks,  Ancientanubis ,  talk  05:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * well mainly what i really wanted to get rid of was the largness of the box as a whole, when i designed the box i planned for it to be small like it is now as i feel it makes more sense for the information that is posted within it... does that make any sense? Ancientanubis ,  talk  15:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


 * in all honesty i was just dissatisfied with the edit you made to the "look" of the nav box as a whole, which was why i reverted it back to its origional look, BUT i did keep the new link updates you made to the page.... does that make any more sense???  Ancientanubis ,  talk  16:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

TV market navigation boxes
I didn't know about the usage of CSS/XHTML codes on Wikipedia. I was fixing the market template, as I separated some of the semi-satellites of Bismarck TV stations, since they usually identify themselves separately.-- milk the cows (Talk) 22:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

PDFbot changed KB->KiB
In this revision of Aspect ratio (image) PDFBot changed KB to KiB. I thought it was not supposed to do that! What happened? jhawkinson 06:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Also in this rev of 35 mm film. This is not OK! jhawkinson 06:34, 4 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I am not happy with your response. I view it as a real problem that you have a bot removing KB and replacing it with KiB. I'm not sure what the next step is, but I will probably bring this up elsewhere. jhawkinson 03:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Use of anchor in Transformer
Hi, can you tell me what this edit is doing? I can see it has created an HTML anchor, but it's dropped the box heading, and removed it from the table of contents. Best regards, &mdash; BillC talk 16:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for replying. &mdash; BillC talk 17:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Good work
Good work with the Melb templates, that's been needing to be done for a long time. :) Orderinchaos 04:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

RE:McMaster University template
I was wondering if the categories under "faculties", "schools" and "special programmes" of the template be align center? At the moment its shifted to the left. Thanks 219.77.171.166 05:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:McMaster

some more
Great job on the t-navbar, could you do these as well (Center District (Israel), Judea and Samaria, Tel Aviv District)? Thank you,  Tewfik Talk 18:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:50thStreetAlice.jpg
Thanks for your note with the copyright tag on this image - I'm not entirely sure what to change the tag to. I would love some advice as you seem experienced in this area. Thanks H0n0r 05:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Wallaby characters
Template:Wallaby characters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. —Quasirandom 17:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Bot creation
I have a question that you may be able to answer. I saw you post on the WT:EL page that you had created a bot. I have no idea how to create bots or i would know the answer to this question. Could a bot be built that would remove duplicate wiki links in an article? I'm trying to read up on what people think of repeatedly used WLs in articles, but it the meantime, was just a question that i thought you might be able to help answer. I'm watching here so you can either respond here or on my talk page and i'll see it. Jmfangio ► Talk 01:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Toolserveraccount
Hello Dispenser, please send your real-name, your wikiname, your prefered login-name and the public part of your ssh-key to. We plan to create your account soon then. --DaB. P.S: Please be sure that the script has enough sleeping time between 2 checks. --DaB.

S.E.S. template
Thanks for fixing it! I've been stuck on that for who knows how long. *prize* Pandacomics 02:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

external link checker spider strange limit operation
This looks like a very useful tool, so of course I pointed it at WikiProject Oregon's pages. It appears to have hit the limit value and terminated. There are over 4000 pages in article I gave it to link from, WikiProject_Oregon/Admin, so I tried typing a few different values in the "Page limit" field, but it seems to do something unexpected with the values I typed in (like 30000 and 9000), instead using limits like 441 and 213. What's it doing? —EncMstr 01:26, 31 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the quick response. We eagerly await its completion.  —EncMstr 01:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

external link spider ideas/questions
It finished after about 12 hours running; too bad other items in the queue were delayed.
 * Could it process two in parallel, perhaps choosing the longest and shortest jobs?
 * How about a way for the initiating user to stop it?
 * The summary screen gives total rows; how about adding subtotals for each color category? Maybe even totals for each status code?

Questions: 200 	OK 	Portland State Population Research Center  [pdx.edu] 	application/msexcel for .xls file Is it flagging all non HTML document type returns? 52 		Online Directory: Oregon, USA  [sister-cities.org] 	httplib error All in all, an extremely useful tool. Thank you! —EncMstr 14:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * How long will the result page be available?
 * Under Eagle Point, Oregon, it says
 * Under Eugene, Oregon, what does this mean?


 * I have more ideas here. —EncMstr 20:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

new features
Hi Dispenser. You've been busy. Don't pay too much attention to the grumpier WPOR folks.

On the new run, there are some entries with the "comments" column containing "Clean URL" linked to a non-existent wikipedia article. What's that about? —EncMstr 20:41, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:GeoTemplate/Lang
Could you tell me what {title} dose. If it doesn't do anything, then I'd rather remove them all. --Steinninn 20:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Breaking things
Please review this edit - it appears that that PDFbot inserted an invisible comment within an existing invisible comment, and that broke things. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:39, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Test regexes newline handling
Do i just need to .Replace("\r", "") on the "Source" on the test regex button...?

Reedy Boy 19:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:NarniaBooks
Template:NarniaBooks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — CR7 (message me) 18:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

\n
can you check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Bugs#.5Cr_bug_in_regex_mode if you get the same with regexes I posted? the second regex seems to work well (in the diff) if I put \r\n in "replace with" field instead of \n --84.234.42.68 13:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

should I create an account to get an answer from you or what? --84.234.42.68 11:46, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

thanks for your suggestion --84.234.42.68 14:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Template cleanup
I saw your note on Bot requests. You may be interested in WP:DOT. It's a sort of task force trying to deal with the absurdly large number of untranscluded, orphaned, or deprecated templates. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Cheers. --MZMcBride 19:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

AWB Feature Request: Passing output to CLI program
Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Feature_requests

Hope this helps

Reedy Boy 11:14, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Dead Link tagging
I just noticed you tagged some references as having dead links on the Nine Inch Nails page (dif). They do contain dead links, though they also contain links to archived version of those pages. The dead link is provided for transparency's sake, and is a very normal procedure as far as I know. Therefore, these tags seem unnecessary to me, as well as defeating the whole purpose of providing archived links. Drewcifer 03:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Ambox width
I just wanted to drop in and say thanks for your advice on the ambox width problem. Your solution seems to work perfectly. --David Göthberg 02:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Anti-gravity
Michael Busch has requested a straw poll of Anti-gravity. You may want to add your comments. Tcisco 01:21, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Tabs at GeoTemplate
Thanks for adding the tabs. Any idea of how to make them into plainlinks? I added class="plainlinks" but it always breakes the code. --Steinninn 13:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Dead link tool
Sorry to bother you. Are you the author/maintainer of the dead link tool? If so, I want to report this problem. -- Boracay Bill 03:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

kill your php-cgi processes
Hi, please killall php-cgi on the toolserver since they are flooding the toolserver... -- Bryan ( talk|commons ) 18:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey thank you! Toolserver is working again. -- Bryan ( talk|commons ) 19:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Navbox sandbox
Hi, I noticed your edits in the Navbox sandbox, and have some concerns. The testcases page says "a blank state= should be the same as if it didn't exist". This is not the case. A blank state should cause the navbox to expand by default, while no state default to autocollapse. So using a #switch makes no sense, unless you want to built in an explicit value for state to expand by default (which would break possibly thousands of pages). Also, you took state=plain out of navbar... after I put it into state to make a plain table possible, I can't really understand this move. Could you elaborate your plans on the talk page? — Edokter  •  Talk  • 18:49, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Dead link tool
I just noticed the dead link tool you installed at and left some questions at WT:FAC. I also tried to install it at for WP:FAR, but I'm not sure I've done that correctly. If you have time, would you mind checking? Thanks, Sandy Georgia (Talk) 02:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * You've got a fabulous start, and it's going to be very useful, but I'm having a hard time making it go consistently. Probably my fault :-)  For example, looking at the articles currently at FAC, it tells me that 2006 Oklahoma Sooners football team has a lot of 404 errors.  Can I grab that list of errors for that article only and post it to the FAC for that article as a link?  I can't find a place to locate a link for a specific article; are you able to do that and show us how?  I started a thread at the talk page of WP:FAC; can you give examples there?  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 06:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Or Hrant Dink, which also has far too many 404 errors for a Featured article candidate. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 06:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * ...  there's a link right next to the title atop of each group. Still trying, I'm not getting that link. Is that because I'm on Internet Explorer maybe?  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 06:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

OK if the article-specific links get removed from Featured article preload now? Gimmetrow 08:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC)