User talk:Displaystyle

Welcome!
Hello, Displaystyle, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Conflux Network, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ThaddeusSholto (talk) 15:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Conflux Network


A tag has been placed on Draft:Conflux Network, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://doc.confluxnetwork.org/docs/general/conflux-basics/what-is-conflux/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 15:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 16:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I have removed the promotional parts of your unblock request. If you persist in promoting the network, I will revoke your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * According to your message, I was advertising something.
 * This page does not exist. The deletion, protection, and move log for the page are provided below for reference.
 * 16:10, 19 February 2024 Bbb23 talk contribs deleted page Draft:Conflux Network (Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria G11, G12. Source URL: https://doc.confluxnetwork.org/docs/general/conflux-basics/what- is-conflux/)
 * But even the provided link is our official resource, what is the problem with blocking when I am registered at the official email address of the project on Wikipedia and give official links from the project, don’t you think this is strange? Displaystyle (talk) 18:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Not every comment needs to be an unblock request, and please place new comments at the bottom so a chronological order is maintained. This may be easier to do if you click "Edit" at the top of this page instead of using the imperfect Reply feature.
 * We don't care(and have no knowledge of) what email address you attach to this account. Please see other stuff exists as to why the existence of other articles has little bearing on your editing. It could be that these other articles are also inappropriate and just not addressed yet by a volunteer.  Also be aware that due to extensive disruption in this topic area, there are special rules for editing about blockchain and crypto(see General sanctions/Blockchain and cryptocurrencies).  We don't want to know what your company says about itself, we want to know what others wholly unaffiliated with the company choose on their own to say about it. 331dot (talk) 18:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I understand, so will you unblock my account? Displaystyle (talk) 18:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * You do not understand. You are permitted only one unblock request at a time. Your conduct here is disruptive, and you are close to having your Talk page access revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)