User talk:Disruptive VI

May 2016
Hello, I'm [a really big scrub. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Married Women's Property Act 1884— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Clubjustin (talk) 13:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Japanese Americans with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Clubjustin (talk) 14:15, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Japanese Americans with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Clubjustin (talk) 14:16, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia (disambiguation). Dcirovic (talk) 14:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 14:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)