User talk:Dissident93/Archive 8

Sega Ages Switch series
I don't think you can count the SEGA AGES as a compilation. A compilation would be several different games put together in one package, as SEGA GENESIS CLASSICS release is. The SEGA AGES is a series of separate releases, not a compilation. Additionally, why are SEGA AGES and SONIC THE HEDGEHOG listed on the Switch page as a separate releases? It makes no sense as there is no game/individual release called SEGA AGES; it's a brand name for a reissues programme. The SEGA AGES releases should either be individually logged as separate releases (if I wanted both Thunder Force IV and Sonic the Hedgehog, I buy and pay from them separately, they are not a compilation), or they need to be separately linked to, as is the case with Hamster's ARCADE ARCHIVE re-issue series.

AnOrdinaryBoy (talk) 11:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Better to post this on the talk page there than here if you want to garner more opinion. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 18:10, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Jun Chikuma discography
In this revision, you removed information about her non-game discography. Was that mostly because it was formated in an unorthodox and slightly confusing way? I was going to add a section similar to this, so I thought I'd ask for advice from someone more knowledgeable on game music articles. RoseCherry64 (talk) 00:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I did, mostly because it was a large collection of unsourced entries. At least the games can be reasonably confirmed to have been worked on by Chikuma, so I kept them. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 03:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

PSG.LGD <-> LGD Gaming pages division
So can we get to work on fixing the atrocious state the page is in? Worldless0 (talk) 01:45, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Let me ask you something. So on this page [1] it lists LGD Gaming as being a member of the LPL (League of Legends Pro League from China, which is run by Tencent), yet a stand alone page regarding their other sports was REMOVED by you Dissedent93. Does this mean that Wikipedia does not meet your standards as a source? Please help me understand that LGD Gaming, a stand alone sports organization who participates in multiple esports cannot get it's own page, when Wikipedia itself has them in multiple esports leagues. LGDGamingFan (talk) 15:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.135.154.125 (talk)
 * Uh, yes, Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source, especially not for proving any sort of notability in regards to WP:GNG. It's probably time you drop the stick and move on, the stand alone page is extremely unlikely to exist at this time. -- ferret (talk) 19:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * We've have discussed this multiple times. The non-Dota 2 divisions of LGD lack enough good sources to have its own independent article. And I wouldn't use the fact that other esport organizations have articles here as an argument, as a lot of them also fail WP:GNG and should probably go to AfD. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 22:29, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Alex Smith/currency edit
While you are correct, may I point out the full sentence (quoting from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Currencies):

"Use the full abbreviation on first use (US$ for the US dollar and A$ for the Australian dollar), unless the currency is already clear from context." (emphasis theirs)

It then continues:

"For example, the government of the United States always spends money in American dollars, and never in Canadian or Australian dollars."

It is this same reasoning with which I made the edit in the first place. Why would an American player on an American team use any other currency besides the American dollar?

That is why I respectfully request that you restore the text or allow me to do it.

Sincerely, 1980fast (talk) 00:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's reasonable. I'll go ahead and revert. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I see you've already undone it. Have a great day! 1980fast (talk) 20:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of video games by player count for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of video games by player count is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of video games by player count until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 19:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Winning Percentage in NFL QB Wins page
It appears that you removed the winning percentage column in the table. Why would you do that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.137.223 (talk) 23:45, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Because in a bloated table, raw wins are more important than win percentage. If you want to discuss its return, do so on its talk page. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 00:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

About Dragalia Lost release date
Hello, I know you said that only English releases are allowed. But is there anywhere where the other countries can be placed? As for people such as myself that live in Australia, Dragalia Lost doesn't appear on Google Play, and when I spoke to them, they said that the app hasn't been released in Australia and that it was region locked. By having one release date, it will make people think that it has been released in other English countries, but then find out that it hasn't. Not sure what you mean by "place it in prose". Any help would gladly appreciated. Thank you so much! —Platinum Lucario (talk) 14:28, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, they belong in prose (the history/release section of the article), WP:VG/DATE says we should only include English regions (along with the developer's region, which is Japan in this case) in the lead and infobox. I'll fix it if you haven't by the time I see this. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 20:24, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Rolando McClain
Do you have a source that McClain has been released by the Cowboys since his suspension? Otherwise, suspended players have their contracts toll for each year suspended, meaning McClain will indefinitely be a member of the Cowboys until they release him from his contract. Same with Justin Blackmon, who is still technically under contract with the Jaguars despite being suspended indefinitely. Mychal Kendricks will be in the same scenario unless and until he is reinstated from suspension or the Seahawks release him.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  17:36, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, just because a player is not listed on a team website run by a PR department does not mean they are not technically on the roster. Those rosters are not 100% accurate.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  17:39, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * They are the team's official rosters, if they are no longer listed there they shouldn't be listed here either. You are just assuming (WP:OR) that he's still an active member of the team because there was never any official transaction releasing him. I'm pretty sure we already discussed this over at WT:NFL. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 20:22, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The team rosters are unofficial just like the depth charts put out by the PR department. For instance, Le'Veon Bell is listed under "Reserve/Franchise Tag" on the Steelers' "official" roster despite Reserve/Franchise Tag not being an official NFL roster designation and Bell technically not being a member of the Steelers' roster since he has not signed a contract. Mychal Kendricks is nowhere to be seen on the "official" Seahawks roster despite being suspended just days ago. If you were a member of the team's PR department, would it help your brand to promote a possible negative mark on your team by listing a player suspended indefinitely by the NFL? I'm assuming McClain is still a member of the team (i.e. under contract) because there is no evidence that he is not a member of the team and lots of evidence that he is a member of the team. Just because there is no end date to his tenure yet doesn't mean there won't be one in the future (like in the case of Tyrone Robertson).  It doesn't appear that a consensus was reached on this matter at WT:NFL, and I understand that you want to put a cap on some of these players' careers but please exercise patience.  Eagles   24/7   (C)  14:11, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * What happened between this discussion and now for you? You seem to agree with my argument in March, but now completely disagree.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  14:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Nothing did. If you had brought up Robertson's example then, I would have 100% disagreed and cited it as an extreme example we shouldn't account for. He obviously was not an active member of the team for 15 years (no contact with the team, no attempts to return), so him being released from the list after that long is an exceptional case. Even Blackmon is no longer listed on the Jaguar's roster, so I'd support removing him being of a current member of the team from his page if we were to have this discussion again (which we should, because I don't agree with your recent edits). ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 20:57, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Please see WT:NFL.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  21:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Atari
LordTobi said I should speak to you about the Atari edit I did (and you reverted) on The Witcher.

He said to be that he finds it useful to put Atari, Inc. to visually disambiguate it from other Ataris that have existed and still do (such as Atari, SA). I'm sure you know this but the company that's currently known as Atari, Inc. (which is linked into the infobox of the page, but when shown it just says Atari) isn't the same Atari, Inc. from years prior.

Could you tell me which name is more or less a better choice? Luigitehplumber (talk) 12:38, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Where was the discussion held? It's better if more people are involved. But anyway, I think Atari as the brand name (and thus WP:COMMONNAME) should be used instead of the corporate name. I just don't think it matters in context of the Witcher because the company doesn't market itself as anything other than just Atari. Also, the proper redirect still exists, so anybody who clicks on it will understand the difference. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 17:30, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I’ll go on Lordtobi’s Talk Page and talk about what you’d said. A discussion about the name for Atari on pages sounds like a cool idea. Luigitehplumber (talk) 17:43, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I think that even you disagree with my approach, you can see why I've done this. I get your perspective here, but just for readability reasons we should just settle on the generic Atari brand/common name. If it's actually important to the game being published, it could just be explained in the development/release section. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 17:49, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I’ve messages Lordtobi about what you’ve said, and he might message on your talk page about it or something like that. However just in case we might have to enquire other users to use the Atari, Inc. name though. Luigitehplumber (talk) 17:52, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The discussion should have just been held in the more public Witcher talk page, as it directly related to that. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 17:53, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

NFL starting QBs
That looks good but it breaks the sorting (can't see who's been starting QB the longest, shortest). We could put a hidden sort key in and sort on that instead if you prefer the week # to the date. Cheers, Facts707 (talk) 00:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * You could add a sorting template to it so it goes correctly by year first. I'll do that in a bit. EDIT: Done. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 17:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

David Wise's birth year
Hello Dissident93. I can't seem to find a reliable source for Dave's birth year, Find My Past website is the only reliable source I can find. I'm sure you understand. 149.147.223.146 (talk) 05:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If you can't find a reliable source for it (or the original source for the Find My Past claim), then it doesn't belong. I'm sure you can understand why. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 17:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

LGD Gaming
Hey there,

Is there any chance you can help me create the LGD Gaming standalone page?

I can give you any and all citations you need.

I am really new to wiki so I don't know my way around or I would do it.

Let me know as I would love to work on this with you.
 * If you can find enough non-Dota 2 sources, then the PSG.LGD page should be re-merged back instead. Could you provide a list of any you have found so far? ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 22:19, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Template edit
Hi. Regarding this edit, at the time I made the edit, Multiplayer and Multiplayer video game did not take the reader to the same article. That seems to have been reverted since my edit. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 22:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Undiscussed change of a 3500+ actively/regularly linked redirect to a disamb was contested. The user had to be warned several times by multiple editors to stop and seek consensus. -- ferret (talk) 22:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it seems another editor changed it without discussion, which is now fixed. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 22:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Runescape and the "official wiki" section
Hi,

I saw you had removed a portion of the "official wiki" section. Do you think the section should be outright removed 100%? If it was up to me, I don't think its necessary and a rather distraction. Hayholt (talk) 12:28, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Personally, I think so. I was only trying to compromise with the other two editors who had completely different viewpoints on the matter. If you'd like to start a talk page discussion for it, I'll support its entire removal. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 17:37, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I wrote on the talk page. Hayholt (talk) 18:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Derecine artwork.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Witcher 3 projects
Sorry Dissident, I just played the game but not an expert of the series. Reading "his missing adopted daughter on the run from the Wild Hunt: an otherworldly force determined to capture and use her powers" and reading the Wild Hunt article I thought it was a bit based on actual European folklore and mythology. My bad. Lone Internaut (talk) 07:03, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem, seems like somebody linked that to the generic concept of it, which I'm not sure if it should be or not. 00:20, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

UGH!
Do I simply have to tell you guys time and time again? Some of the games HAVE SOURCES such as Battery Jam which is from NLife. Some of them have wikilinks, which have sources stated. YOU need to think about what you are doing and again, if this keeps up, I'm just gonna repeat it over and over until you guys get sick and tired of it. I really don't think YOU understand what it means by a "Volunteer effort". Zacharyalejandro (talk) 18:31, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * And some (actually most, if my first glance wasn't wrong) of the games you added lacked both a wikilink or a source, meaning they don't belong, so why even add them in? Hoping that somebody wouldn't notice them or something? ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 18:41, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by most? Mr. JamminBen here has been adding release dates from Nintendo.co.uk, (which he also links in the edit summary) and some from the actual UK eShop. So why the hell can't we add games from Nintendo.com? Zacharyalejandro (talk) 18:52, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

And this discussion isn't over. How about not removing the release dates for some games that need a simple source update such as R-Type Dimensions EX, (which is clearly stated in Nintendo's websites), a few Japanese games, (which were linked from Gematsu, which you removed without reason) Old School Musical (September 13th), Professional Farmer (November 29th), Nelke & the Legendary Alchemists: Ateliers of the New World (JP: January 31, 2019 NA: March 26, 2019, EU: March 29, 2019. The list just goes on and on, and I would like an explanation as to why instead of removing games without sources, you undid the list entirely even with some of them clearly having sources that notify its existence. I again, had the list perfectly updated and was going to continue not that long after with updating sources, but this was ridiculous on your part. Zacharyalejandro (talk) 05:18, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Because when you add a giant 14,000 bytes in a single edit, no one is going to comb through it to try to save the handful of good entries when its clear that most of it is problematic due to no sourcing or bluelink. It's unrealistic to expect someone to spend that much time trying to save your edit, which is why you've been repeatedly cautioned against such large edits. If it has an issue, the entire thing is going to get reverted. -- ferret (talk) 12:46, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * How is it ridiculous on my part if you submit a huge edit at once, when much of it (although not all) goes against talk page discussions we have had for months regarding what belongs or not. Since you have been aware of these from the start, I really don't know if you feign ignorance when it comes to this, because this has been a constant issue with you. The valid stuff should go back of course, but why couldn't you at least do those separately before trying to add those unsourced games? The fault here lies with you, not any of us. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 19:13, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Hayter
Why should David Hayter be there? He did not write any game. He only voiced two characters and was replaced by another one for the V games.Tintor2 (talk) 22:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Who says he had to be a writer? And how is voicing the main protagonist for most of the games in the series not notable? ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 02:08, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Then the other actors would need to added with that sort of idea leading to a lot of undue weight.Tintor2 (talk) 15:41, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I disagree. How is adding two voice actors that voice the main protagonist for the majority of the Solid series undue weight? But then you had no problem with Ashley Wood who only did illustrations for two adapted comics? ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 18:13, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


 * I didn't add Wood. By the way, with the idea of Hayter being there, Sutherland would count. However, you forget that none of them are present in Rising.Tintor2 (talk) 18:54, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Never said you did add him, just that you didn't remove him for undue weight when Hayter has way more of a connection to the series than Wood does. And Sutherland only voiced the protagonist of MGS5, not 1, 2, 3, 4, and various other spinoffs like Hayter (and Otsuka) did. And Snake is not even in Rising, so how is that an argument? ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 18:57, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * You missed the point. There is no reason in putting the voice actors when we have characters article who talk about them.Tintor2 (talk) 19:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Except there is a point to putting in relevant and notable people related to the franchise, regardless of their role. If you ask others, they will most like say the same. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 19:17, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Okay, I'll request a third opinion.Tintor2 (talk) 22:22, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * It is unclear what article you are referring to. I went to a couple of metal gear articles with no history of your activity there. Please move this discussion (copy & paste) to the article's talk page and resubmit your request for a 3rd opinion using that talk page. Before doing so, it might be wise, for argument's sake, to find other gaming articles which do or do not follow this style in their infobox.  Dig deeper talk 01:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Its the Metal Gear navbox. And most other, if not all, other gaming franchise navboxes include anybody closely related to it. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 03:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Discord
Not normally in a habit of direct invites but you should hang out in the WPVG channel for Discord. -- ferret (talk) 15:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll check it out tomorrow, maybe later tonight. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 03:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Torna
I figured since Torna is a standalone expansion it was fair inclusion, but it's not something that matters too much either way. --Shadoman (talk) 06:29, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Standalone meaning it can be played without owning the base game? Usually expansion packs/DLC like this are just kept to prose instead of the main worklist. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 17:36, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, Torna has a physical standalone version, on its own cartridge. If you own XB2 you can get it as part of the season pass, but if you don't (or even if you do and you just like having separate carts) you can play the physical version by itself separate from the base game. --Shadoman (talk) 14:59, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I know it has its own physical release, but it can actually be played without even owning/have played Xenoblade 2? In that case it should be moved back into the worklist. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 18:21, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, you can play it by itself even if you don't own Xenoblade 2. In fact they specifically said when making the game that they made a lot of it with people who were playing it first/by itself in mind. --Shadoman (talk) 02:00, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Well that's my own ignorance then. I'll re-add it to the list (and Monolith's). ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 20:10, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey, no worries! Glad it's all sorted! --Shadoman (talk) 07:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

<small style="color:red">JOE BRO  64  is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. <small style="color:red">JOE BRO  64  15:22, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Update to scripts by AlexTheWhovian/Alex 21
Hello! This is a generic message created and copied to all editors using scripts that I have created. As I have recently changed my username from "User:AlexTheWhovian" to "User:Alex 21", any scripts that I have created that are listed at your common.js page may, at the moment, no longer be working. To fix this, simply update all occurrences of "User:AlexTheWhovian" to "User:Alex 21"; see here for an example. All the best! -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  11:03, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

"Low quality"
Hey, apologies for hassling you a lot this evening.

This is an extremely minor point but here's how I see this from a copyediting perspective.

Something I often remove in articles are sentences like "Ebert criticised the poor acting." Although it's clear this means that in Ebert's opinion the film had poor acting, to be strict about it, what it literally says is "The film has poor acting, which Ebert criticised". That's a POV problem. I'd rewrite it as "Ebert criticised the acting", which is completely neutral and also clear in meaning.

So the same thing applies here. If we write "MJ was dissatisfied with the low-quality audio" it means the audio was low-quality and he was dissatisfied by it.

A similar problem I often fix is (for example) "The politician was condemned for sexism", which should be "The politician was condemned as sexist". Otherwise we're writing that the politician was indeed sexist, and was condemned for it. Popcornduff (talk) 23:05, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * No, you're right. While I'm pretty sure that one of the sources (that probably get removed) explicated said that MJ did not like the low-quality of the YM2612 sound chip, it does seem a bit biased to explicitly say that on Wikipedia. In any case, "criticized the system's audio capabilities" is a much better phrase anyway, as its both more neutral and clear. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 23:16, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

RE Engine
Hi Dissident. I am a little puzzled about deletion of RE Engine article. My thought was that a dedicated article needed to exist, besides its initial quality, as the RE Engine represents Capcom's new game engine technology. The article was created with the idea of being an initial stub, to which other users would have contributed - me myself, in the time I could. It's better not to kill things in the bud as, however, in a couple of years - even less - the article will reappear, when more games will be based on RE Engine. Lone Internaut (talk) 06:39, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Saying that more games in the future will use it (and therefore justifying its existing) is WP:CRYSTAL. And even if that is true, the sources currently in use in the article were only passively mentioning it, and did not specifically discuss it in detail. If you would like, I could bring it back up to AfD so more people can discuss it and reach a proper consensus. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 06:43, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * No, wait, it was not my personal assumption or CRYSTAL: Capcom confirmed that RE Engine is their future technology and would be supported - 3 games published in 2 years use it - just want to clarify that. Anyway we can try this road you proposed, it's fine for me try to reach proper consensus. Lone Internaut (talk) 07:05, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Fine, but that still doesn't give it independently notability on its own. What makes this engine notable? All the sources that were in use in the article simply said "this game will use it" and nothing more. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 19:11, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe this idea of making it a "work in progress" stub didn't pay off, I admit, yes. Indeed, sources at the time of creation were an assist, something to show that I had given a starting point, but it's true that they were near useless. I just thought that RE Engine deserved an article, simply because it's an engine on which Capcom has decided to bet, which is used by three games of mid importance, and that was much appreciated for its graphic rendering as it was MT Framework back in the years. Simply this. Lone Internaut (talk) 06:30, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Nothing "deserves" an article, they should only be created if notability for them already exists. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 23:46, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * It's a second language for me, pardon me for using improper terminology. With "deserve" I just meant I thought it had notability and acted to create the article. Lone Internaut (talk) 05:43, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I see. Well if you still doubt me, we can always do a proper AfD nomination and see what others think? ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 19:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * It's not that I doubt what you say, just maybe better for some people to join a discussion and reaching consensus. I should have done it in the first place but I feared the propose would have gone ignored since the great deal of work of the project. Of course it would be better to make clear that the article could be improved over time, or that its notability - if other users think it is not notable now - could increase over time. So, yes, I would like to know what others think. Lone Internaut (talk) 19:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree, and will set one up. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 20:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I really thank you for your help and patience. I'm looking forward to it. Lone Internaut (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem, I probably should have done this from the start. AfD is here. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 20:37, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Spliting discussion for Nintendo Integrated Research & Development
An article that you have been involved with (Nintendo Integrated Research & Development) has content that is proposed to be removed and move to another article (Nintendo Research & Engineering). If you are interested, please visit the discussion at Talk:Nintendo Integrated Research & Development. Thank you. ~ <b style="color: #8cc5ff;">Arkhandar</b> (<b style="color: #b3b3b3;">message me</b>) 18:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Repeat blanking
At list of video game musicians, you redirected it. Someone contested it. That person should've used an edit summary, it's true, but it's on you to find consensus at this point. I don't know why you would take it to AfD, though, as it's an obviously appropriate list. It could certainly use more sources, but even at its most basic it would be an appropriate navigational list (there's no WP:NOT issue; it includes only notable examples, with other ideas for inclusion on the talk page). &mdash; Rhododendrites  <sup style="font-size:80%;">talk \\ 02:22, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

My apologies
I've been meaning to say (for a while now) that I'm sorry I was uncivil to you a while back. I know we disagree on a lot but I still am extremely grateful for your contributions and highly respect you. <small style="color:red">JOE BRO  64  19:06, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries, I probably could have been less harsh/critical of you myself. As long as the article or list or whatever improves as a result, which it usually does, then I think it's mostly worth the hassle. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 19:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Nintendo EAD
Regarding your recent edits on the Nintendo EAD article, I understand that like all of us here you're trying to improve the article in the best way you can. However, your behavior hasn't been the best I'm afraid. Blindly reverting edits and doing it without edit notes will just get us nowhere. While I do understand you're rationale, you need to understand that you're dealing with different articles, with different contexts. I didn't start a discussion on WP:VG regarding the Nintendo EPD producers because I don't think there's enough basis to include them yet. However, if you don't agree for their inclusion on EAD, I'd advise you to star that discussion if you'd like. In all, I'm just asking you to be more patient with how things go and listen to what people have to say. If the whole cell merge discussion thing taught us anything is that you should wait a bit before rampaging on reverts. Happy editing. ~ <b style="color: #8cc5ff;">Arkhandar</b> (<b style="color: #b3b3b3;">message me</b>) 19:30, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:BRD. I've been the one to start the talk pages discussions to help resolve issues (both for and against stuff that I argued) before it reached full edit war status, which has (IMO) improved the pages from its previous state a few weeks ago. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 20:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Recall - Article: Catherine (Video Game)
About removing my last edit, Which it should not be.

I'm asking to some editors to update it via Talk Page and Not removing it or Modify into other source that is not really exist Maryjanequino (talk) 15:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:BURDEN is on the editor who adds the claim to provide it, not anybody else. ~ <b style="color: #660000;">Dissident93</b> (<b style="color: #D18719;">talk</b>) 00:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)