User talk:Dissidentrightindian

May 2020
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Dissident right. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 02:47, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Ok, I will add sources for my claims — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dissidentrightindian (talk • contribs) 02:47, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * If you plan in writing an entire article on something as controversial and niche as the "dissident right" you should really makes sure these sources are reliable. This will also mean that they are independent of the dissident right. For example, Fuentes' own work is not reliable for Wikipedia for several reasons. Help:Your first article and Drafts may also help. Grayfell (talk) 02:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

I've added sources from left wing, right wing, and neutral sources. -thedissidentindian


 * No, those are not reliable sources. Please review the links above. Don't cite blogs or other user-generated content such as youtube videos. Cite published works, such as news sources or books, with a positive reputation for accuracy and fact checking. Summarize those sources neutrally, which doesn't mean false balance. See WP:NPOV. Wikipedia isn't a platform for advocacy, also. Grayfell (talk) 02:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Understood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dissidentrightindian (talk • contribs) 03:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I should also mention that source must actually mention "dissident right". It may be obvious to you that "groyper" and "dissident right" are the same, but that's just more original research. If you think this term gets an article, you need to find sources which explain the term directly. Make sure there are enough sources for the term to meet Notability. Otherwise it will be a waste of time.
 * Please also see Signatures. When posting to talk pages, please add a signature by added ~ at the end of your comment. Grayfell (talk) 03:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Should I make the article about "Groypers" instead? Dissident Right isn't a well known term tbh. But I don't know how to make a new article. Again, I'm new to wikipedia. Dissidentrightindian (talk) 03:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * TBH, you're wading into a mine-field with your first edits. There have been a lot of trolls editing related to Fuentes, so be aware that people's patience is pretty thin. That shouldn't stop you, but know what you're getting into.
 * I would start by contributing to Draft:Groyper, which was started a few months ago. If you mention any specific people, make sure edits follow Biographies of living persons. If you find a reliable source that mentions "dissident right", use that, but make sure you include what the source actually says, not what you think it implies. You can also ask questions at Teahouse Grayfell (talk) 03:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Groyper

What do you think of this? I tried to make it as netural and accurate as possible.

Dissidentrightindian (talk)Dissidentrightindian (talk) 20:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I've declined the draft, since it's very premature. It will need a lot more work before it's ready to move to article space.
 * You need to summarize what sources are actually saying, but the draft did not do that. For a short article on a controversial topic, it's very useful to cite specific claims, instead of just adding links to the end. See Help:Referencing for beginners. The draft you wrote added a lot of personal opinions as facts, but this isn't appropriate. Every opinion needs to be attributed to a source, and specific claims of fact also need to be sourced. Instead of writing what you personally know, read what reliable sources are saying and summarize that. Grayfell (talk) 21:18, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

You don't need Grayfell's permission to move the article into mainspace; it has sufficient reliable sources to show notability so you can just move it into main space yourself and it should be able to survive. CovidWriter (talk) 02:51, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Since CovidWriter was blocked for disruptive editing, you should ignore that bad advice. Grayfell (talk) 05:19, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * And for defending Hitler and the far right in general. Doug Weller  talk 09:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 12:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Draft:Groyper has been reverted. Your edit here to Draft:Groyper was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/groyper) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)