User talk:DistributorScientiae

Your article Harith al-Hamdani
Greetings, Huzefa! I spotted the above article while patrolling the new content, and noted the above page. Knowing very little about Islam beyond some of the basic history of the faith, I can't make changes to the article content - but we do have a project on Islam, and plenty of editors who work with the project. With this, then, I have tagged the article so that they can give it some attention and bring it to our standards.

This said, the article also contains no references. This isn't a qualifier to have an article deleted unto itself, but it is cause for concern. For this, you will want to read up on the related guidelines.

Blessings, and welcome again to Wikipedia. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 22:26, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Hadith of the pond of Khumm
Wikipedia is not a collection of quotes. You are adding far to many to the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

ww2censor (talk) 15:23, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Mad Caliph
I was not the editor that reverted your change, but I do believe in inclusion of the name. A search for that term in Google books shows multiple sources using that to refer to him: http://www.google.com/#hl=en&safe=off&q=mad+caliph&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp&ei=DfE6UKqwFumoyAG564DwAg&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=ccbd65a7f6b1790d&biw=1920&bih=934

I tried looking for a source that took issue with that name, as then we could cite that notable source and make a statement like "He is referred in many works in Western Literature as the "Mad Caliph" but this term is seen as derogatory by some, such as [and then here we would note which notable took issue with that name]." Wikipedia has standards on who is notable (so it can't just be some blog), I am hoping there is a historian that makes this arguement or perhaps a leader of the Druze.

One of the main reason he is often referred to by this name is his erratic behavior when it comes to persecution of minorities, flipping back and forth without any apparent logic. This is usually brought up in contrast with the rest of the Caliphs in history who in general were far more tolerant. This term is also used to signify that his behavior doesn't make sense in either the culture of Egypt nor the precepts of Islam, so one should not seek to blame his behavior on either of these.

Because the statement that he is called this can be verified by multiple sources the statement meets wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, that is why its removal is seen as vandalism.

--Wowaconia (talk) 04:17, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh, I had not seen that you had taken the information out again, so this time I will be the person to undo your change and replace that information as it meets the criteria for inclusion (as mentioned above). You should note that in order to prevent what are called "edit wars" Wikipeida has a set of rules and regulations concerning controversy over articles. If you still have issues with the inclusion of the term "Mad Caliph" you can call for a greater discussion on the matter in the article's own discussion page which is accessed by clicking on the "talk" tab at the top of the page.--Wowaconia (talk) 04:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

I have added sourced statements from historians that lay out why he is referred as the Mad Caliph, for reasons similar to what I stated above. I still would like to find a notable source that took issue with the term altogther - I can't believe a Druze would not take issue with that term, but we need to find a notable source rather than put words into people's mouths.--Wowaconia (talk) 05:37, 27 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I have moved this discussion to Talk:Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah to centralise the debate Oncenawhile (talk) 09:56, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Badr al-Jamali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bab al-Nasr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Al-Mamun(Disambiguation)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Al-Mamun(Disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Phileasson (talk) 20:16, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

re : Repeated undoing of sincere editing attempts
Thanks for your message. I don't agree with your logic. Ther is no compraison with democratic election (Obama as you quoted) and this issue. Mufaddal and Khuzaima are both claimant for Dai-ship. Khuzaima followers are Dawoodi Bohra too. We have no idea yet how many followers each claimant have. Mufaddal Saifuddin is controlling the administration, and that's why propably most of media have stated that Dawoodi Bohra accepted him as Dai. I will revert your edit. Reference are valid regarding the sucession issue and both are still claimants. I'm trying to keep a NPOV on this matter. Hope you understand Ftutocdg (talk) 20:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ftutocdg (talk • contribs)


 * All reference regarding the sucession issue have stated on neutral POV. None of them have stated that Mufaddal Saifuddin was Dawoodi Bohra's 53rd Dai. Thats's the problem. The media you talked about have stated for Mufaddal Saifuddin BEFORE this sucession issue openly arise. That's why I wrote "Mufaddal Saifuddin is controlling the administration" - it's a fact too. So keeping in mind wikipedia NPOV policy, "claimant" is necessery to qualify both "dai". I don't need to justify further. Thanks Ftutocdg (talk) 21:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * PS : There are many article on Dawoodi Bohras where basic NPOV are not respected. Your contribution is urged : especially on this fictional Qutbi Bohra article, Progressive Dawoodi Bohra, Taher Saifuddin, ... Ftutocdg (talk) 21:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * may please participate at Talk:Mufaddal saifuddin.--Md iet (talk) 12:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Mufaddal Saifuddin
May participate at talk page if you have any value addition.--Md iet (talk) 06:38, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barjawan


The article Barjawan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no indication of notability, no nothing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – S. Rich (talk) 07:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

The article on Mufaddal Saifuddin is covered by discretionary sanctions
EdJohnston (talk) 16:55, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Logseq


A tag has been placed on Logseq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. microbiology Marcus (petri dish·growths) 19:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Logseq moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Logseq. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Logseq
Hello, DistributorScientiae. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Logseq, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Logseq


Hello, DistributorScientiae. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Logseq".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:23, 30 June 2024 (UTC)