User talk:Disturany

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Dead Sea appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 15:37, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Aveda. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipedia cannot use non-neutral wording (such as "stolen") in its own voice. Hertz1888 (talk) 15:45, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Hertz - Hopefully this latest version works. In fairness resources appropriated illegally under international law are 'stolen' from the displaced soveriegn; nonetheless I respect the Wikipedia neutral point of view policy. Disturany (talk) 23:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Not clear who is the former sovereign, but that is a whole other discussion. In general it is best to let the (reliable) sources do the talking.  I would suggest also being guided by WP:NOTSOAPBOX, especially items 1 & 2. Hertz1888 (talk) 08:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits regarding Spencer Tunick are not neutral as required by Wikipedia policies. The section has been tagged as NPOV for input from other users.--Dmol (talk) 22:43, 19 September 2011 (UTC)