User talk:Diuckal

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Blehfu (talk) 11:44, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Intellicracy
Intelligent Democracy Intellicracy is a new socio-philosophic theory developed by David Levy in Bulgaria and Israel since 1999. The word Intellicracy comes from the Greek philosophical term nous, which was translated into Latin as intellectus (derived from the verb intelligere) and into French (and then English) as intelligence and κράτος (Kratos) "power". The meaning is rule of the intellect.

It differes from meritocracy

Democracy is the best existing public structure and that's one of my basic believes, but I also believe that better structure of the society can be found based on the same or almost the same roles as is the democracy. basically and very simplified the idea of INTELLICRACY (rule of the intellect) is that the vote of each person should be multiplied by a number representing a complex of the IQ of the person, his/hers social, educational and material status, his/hers social involvement and compassion, and other factors. This way the vote of different persons will have different "weight". As we all (hopefully) know, casting ones vote in democratic elections is both Right and Obligation. I firmly believe everybody should have the Right to vote!!! It is the Obligation to vote that different people understand differently. There is the type of person that reads the proposals of the different participants in the elections, learns about them, their believes and their personal history and credibility and makes his conscious decision, and on the contrary there is the person that votes without any process of decision-making, but based on some promise or subjective criteria. I say the first type described should have a bigger influence on the result. In my next postings I'll explain better what I mean, and how, but mainly why is it so importance to improve the existing democratic system. David Levy (talk) 22:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Intellicracy


The article Intellicracy has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Page is WP:OR, an essay written by the author.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:16, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Intellicracy


A tag has been placed on Intellicracy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)