User talk:Diverm

May 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Michael has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gurch (talk) 18:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * And the same with your article Michael Schoular, the most amazingest person ever, but this time with the delete button. Unfortunately, we must uphold certain standards if we are not to drown in this type of article within weeks, so please locate a published reference that states that Michael Schoular is more awesome than Chuck Norris. Better yet, don't. Cheers, Kiz o r  18:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Michael Schoular
A tag has been placed on Michael Schoular, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 21:23, 6 May 2008 (UTC)