User talk:Dividends


 * Interesting that you have few edits prior to this. This is nothing more than attack page. It is based on a non-reliable source- a blog. It looks like nothing more than a part of a smear campaign. Think long and hard before accusing an admin of acting in bad faith. Where are the  reliable sources to support these facts? Let's see them. If they exist, then we may think about the article. As the subject would have no claim to notability other than the smear, it would still fail WP:BLP. Read WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:BIO. Get back to me on my talk page.    Dloh  cierekim  04:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Now that I'm finished screaming
You should really ask yourself if, in the real world, I would mind a smear campaign against a Republican. If you think I would, then you don't know me at all. But Wikipedia is neither a battleground nor a soapbox from which to make political attacks. It is an encyclopedia. And it's purpose is not to carry rumors and political character assassination, even if it does further my off Wiki political agenda. Which any attack against McCain or Palin would. That's what it means to be an editor on Wikipedia. To leave all that outside of one's editing, no matter what the temptation. I've asked another admin to look at the thing. If he thinks it has merit, I will restore and send to WP:AFD. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  04:56, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

PS. As Bristol Palin already exists as a redirect to he mom's article, and as the subject is treated there, recreating the incorrectly capitalized article is not necessary. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  14:42, 2 September 2008 (UTC)