User talk:Divine Code

October 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Noahidism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

While Haaretz may be considered a reliable source in general, the particular article cited in this case makes statements about Noahide populations that are quoted only from one source (the Noahide World Center), which in truth has no actual data to back up those claims, and therefore they are unsubstantiated and quite meaningless. But setting that aside for the moment, I would like to have a discussion with you about the fact that this Wikipedia article is (a) rife with incorrect information, and (2) embarrassingly one-sided in its presentation of the "two different concepts of Noahidism in Judaism." My several attempts to include factual and fully-cited balanced information have been deleted, which leads me to believe that this page is being used for promoting a particular agenda, rather than for the purpose of informing visitors about the facts of the subject.Divine Code (talk) 03:03, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * That is a matter you may address on the talk page, or on WP:RSN. That is not a discussion you should have with me, necessarily. And that you would have to invent some nonsense about editors promoting some agenda is sad--or ironic, given User:Ian.thomson's suspicion. Drmies (talk) 03:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)