User talk:Divyanshu4226

Ram Prasad Bismil was born in a brahmin family.(https://thewire.in/history/ramprasad-bismil-ideology). Read this article. You all people are giving wrong information on Wikipedia.

December 2020
Hello, I'm Fylindfotberserk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of Brahmins, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to List if Brahmins. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''The source should explicitly mention the content. Here the source doesn't mention he word 'Brahmin' but only mentions "born in a Joshi family". We do not treat surnames as identifiers of caste in Wikipedia as per consensus at WP:INB.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:33, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Brahmins. Do not add unsourced content. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:39, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello Fylindfotberserk, Manoj Kumar Pandey was Brahmin born in Lucknow. The Pandey title is by used Brahmin there. Divyanshu4226 (talk) 12:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * There are rules in Wikipedia, according to which we need WP:RS sources for everything we quote and in this case it requires source(s) that explicitly says the individual is of XYZ caste. Deducing caste from surname is a no-no as per WP:OR. For a living person, on top of the above conditions, self-identification is required, that is we need an interview where the person says something like "I am a Brahmin" or "We Rajputs...". I hope you get it. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Note that Wikipedia articles can't be used as sources since they are written by users like us. Also for a living person, you'll need a source in which s/he self-identifies their caste. I told you about this before. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Brahmins has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Brahmins was changed by Divyanshu4226 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897062 on 2021-01-03T08:13:13+00:00


 * I told you many times here as well as in edit summaries. For people who are alive (WP:BLP), the sources should clearly have a self-identification. That is a source where he/she says soemthing like "I'm a Brahmin". This source doesn't work since the article writer calls the person a Brahmin. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Chariotrider555. I noticed that you recently removed content from Prithviraj Chauhan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Chariotrider555 (talk) 13:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Prithviraj Chauhan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Alivardi  (talk)  12:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

There was no reference to the point that prithvi Raj Chauhan was Rajput, please remove that point , give historical facts otherwise remove it from there , Rajput identity does not exist at the time of prithvi Raj Chauhan Divyanshu4226 (talk) 17:44, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Banda Singh Bahadur ‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NitinMlk (talk) 19:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Ram Prasad Bismil, you may be blocked from editing. Do not remove sourced content without discussion on talk page Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 18:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Ram Prasad Bismil. ''Do not delete sourced material from a page, you need to discuss on talk page and form consensus else I am bound to report you to an admin. As i can see other users have already given you warnings for similar caste based vandalism.'' Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 20:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ram Prasad Bismil. -- Toddy1 (talk) 08:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Ram Prasad Bismil. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 08:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Ram_Prasad_Bismil. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 09:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC) Divyanshu4226 is not a vandal. Nevertheless your block was useful. He/she has since placed a useful talk page comment, that explains his/her edit. His/her problem is a belief that he/she could edit-war to get his/her point across, instead of using the article talk page and explaining using citations. I think an indefinite block is too harsh. Please could you consider changing it to a 7 day block. -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I've converted it to an indefinite partial block from the article Ram Prasad Bismil. Happy to re-evaluate if necessary. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 18:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks -- Toddy1 (talk) 21:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)