User talk:Divyanshugautam909

April 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Joseph Sigelman, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hey, I'm Divyanshu. Thank you for taking the time to review my edits to Joseph Sigelman. I appreciate your feedback. Could you please clarify your concerns regarding the edits I made? I made those changes based on reliable sources and tried to ensure that they were neutral and accurate. Divyanshugautam909 (talk) 12:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Joseph Sigelman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Furthermore, the edit summary you left seems inaccurate as it does not mention the content removal, and instead mentions only a separate change, which was repeating information stated elsewhere in the article. Xxthedeathlordxx (talk) 03:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hey, I have made all the changes, and they are correct and valid. Additionally, I have provided references for all of them, so please review them carefully. Divyanshugautam909 (talk) 09:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I have, and the issue is that there is not in added content, but that has still, even following requests for explanation of the content removal from MaterialScientist and myself, been no reason provided for the removal of well-sourced and notable content. Furthermore, some of the information you added was stated elsewhere in the article, and also did not belong in the "early career" section, such as his education, which was stated in the "early life and career" section, his honors and awards, stated later, and the details regarding Lazàrd Freres and Goldman Sachs, which were stated previously. Upon looking closer, per your request, I found that the other added paragraph is directly plagiarized from the source (CEO Magazine). Plagiarism is not acceptable on Wikipedia. If you need guidance regarding these policies, you can check the Teahouse to learn more about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Xxthedeathlordxx (talk) 11:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * More importantly than the additions, you need to explain the deletions. Specifically, the removal of the mention of the $100,000 fine, coupled with the tone of your text, gives the appearance that you are not editing to make the article neutral, but rather to put a positive spin on the subject. —C.Fred (talk) 11:53, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The positive tone of much of the added text is directly copied from the source, and the paragraph appears to be copy-pasted from the lead paragraph of the article. Xxthedeathlordxx (talk) 12:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)