User talk:Diwashpant816

Welcome!
Hello, Diwashpant816, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Diwashpant816/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jack Frost (talk) 11:56, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Diwashpant816/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Diwashpant816/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Jack Frost (talk) 11:56, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Diwashpant816/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Diwashpant816/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Jack Frost (talk) 12:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Diwashpant816, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Reply
Hi, thanks for email. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the school, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the school claims or interviewing its management. Most of your text was unsourced, and the refs you did give were mostly directory listings with text from the school, not indepednet third-party sources. Not all of them supported the text theywere referencing either. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: ''founded by a group of highly experienced and dedicated academicians in 2057B.S... It offers an excellent 10+2 program in science and management and has achieved a well proven track record for last 18 years, with attainment of excellent result from the beginning. Its performance has consistently enhanced and elevated with every passing year helping it to emerge as a prominent leading institute for 10+2 program in the nation. and so on throughout, it's relentless spam
 * it's all about what the school claims to do, but you don't bother withe real facts like numbers of staff or students and actual exam outcomes
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to affiliated sites.
 * the article was a copyright violation of this page. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. The copied site was marked © All rights reserved 2017. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial but there is no indication that the copied site allows free use. Text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.


 * Your image was also a copyright violation of this page, which does not have a public domain tag.


 * You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. Since you work directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:     . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

You said I request you to recover my article so that I could also provide information to others. We often restore deleted text on request, but for legal reasons we don't do so for copyright violations. In any case, there was little factual content in your draft, so better to start from scratch.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above

If you want to reply, you can do so on my talk page. You can alternatively leave a message on this page, and I will know you have done so if you start it with my user name, User:Jimfbleak and sign it with four tildes ~ when you post it. That will send me an alert.

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  14:52, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Introduction
Radiant is a secondary school located in the serine area of Katan, Bhimdatta / Mahendranagar, Mahakali,Kanchanpur District of Nepal. It lies in the Far-Western Development Region, Nepal. It is an educational institute that offers Basic Level and Secondary Level education to the students. Every year about 1300 students attend entrance exams to study in this school, but only about 50% i.e. 650 students only qualify. It offers intermediate education on Science and Management streams. It allows students to study other subjects in Grade XII as non-credit subjects. It is affiliated to National Examination Board (Nepal) previously known as Higher Secondary Education Board of Nepal. Almost every teaching staffs have graduated from international level.

History
Radiant Secondary School was found in 2057 BS(2000AD) by 3 local residents that graduated themselves from Moscow, Pithoragarh and Uttar Pradesh. It was previously on the opposite side of the current building which was took on rent by the 3 founders. Previously, it was named as Radiant Higher Secondary School. As of now, it is named as Radiant Secondary School by the change in the education system of Nepal.

Mission
The mission of the institute is to produce human resources that could contribute for the development of the nation with the education that they have learnt in the student life. It shapes mind of every student in such a way that they could bring positive skills and attitudes towards the nation as well as understand their social duties and responsibilities

Faculty Members
Altogether there are 7 departments that include DoP, DoC, DoB, DoM, DoMg, DoE, and DoNe.

Department of Physics

 * Dr. Balaram Ghimire
 * Bhawani Datt Joshi
 * Dr. Ajay Kumar Jha
 * Mr. Deepak Singh Thapa
 * Mr. Krishna Dev Bhatt
 * Mr. Mahadev Awasthi
 * Mr. Prakash Khatri
 * Mr. Prakash Bokati

Department of Chemistry

 * Mr. Ram Bdr. K.C.
 * Prof. Dr. Bhawani Chand Thakuri
 * Mr. Bishan Singh Airee
 * Prof. Dr. Paras Nath Chaudhary
 * Mr. Bhupendra Chand
 * Mr. Indra Dev Mishra

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radiant Secondary School (July 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheImaCow was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Radiant Secondary School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Radiant Secondary School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Radiant_Secondary_School Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheImaCow&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Radiant_Secondary_School reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 07:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radiant Secondary School has been accepted
 Radiant Secondary School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Radiant_Secondary_School help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Fiddle  Faddle  11:10, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Your question about number of references
Thank you for your email. I never use email to reply. I prefer talk pages.

It's not really a matter of quantity, more of quality and whether facts you assert in the article can be challenged. The normal answer is this:


 * We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this article not subject to deletion (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

That's worth reading.

Look at the article hard, and see what needs to be referenced. I'll have a quick look, too, and flag anything I think it needs. Fiddle  Faddle  11:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * It's not bad at all. I suggest you look at the one request I've flagged, make the student numbers equal (600/650) and then stand well back and let others edit it. Fiddle   Faddle  11:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your question about semi-protection
Please use my talk page instead of email.

All articles get unwanted attention. Very few are protected at all. One instance of vandalism is never considered sufficient. This is why we watch pages. I have 26,920 article on my watch list.

Even if it were within policy I am unable to do anything. I am not an administrator of the project. I am just an editor like you. If vandalism becomes a true problem (rather than misguided person putting strange information in) you can use Wikipedia:Requests for page protection task for the level of protection you think it needs. An admin will look at the page and its edit history and make a judgement. They may agree with your request or disagree with it.

You may argue "But the page displayed incorrect data for some hours!"

That is not important. What is important is that it is there at all. Like a stopped clock is correct twice a day the page is correct for the most part. Fiddle  Faddle  06:23, 16 July 2020 (UTC)