User talk:Diza/Oct05-April06


 * Back to my Current talk page

NO MOTHERFUCKING SPACE BEFORE A COMMA!! --The gremer Nasi

Image Tagging Image:Warptable.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Warptable.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use .)  See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. &mdash;Caesura(t) 17:23, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Carroll's paradox
Hi. The page contains a resolution (the force required is infinite). Doesn't this resolve the paradox? I don't know much more about it than the article says.

best wishes

Robinh 13:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC) Hi. Hi again. Sorry about that. Must have hit the wrong link. Certainly wasn't intentional. Was your edit to my user page intentional? best wishes, Robinh 22:06, 8 January 2006 (UTC) Same here then..:-) Mere technicalitites, hopfully you'd reciprocate my feeling of no harm done.

I'm not sure I fully understand the paradox: After stating that the solution is that this situtation cannot occur...I guess it is understandable I just can't see it..:-) The Procrastinator 13:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) can this reoccur under a non unified gravitational field?
 * 2) is thw width of the rod less than the inner radius ?
 * 3) to what reference point are you measuring the angular momnetum ?

Pi
Hi Jitse, As mentioned in the talk page of this article, as an encyclopedia we, unlike other sources around the net should put on the display a more accurate epproximation of Pi. This article is extensive enough as it is, we can at least be slightly more accurate than the rest of the Google serachers. I'm reverting back to the 100 digit version. (further discc' in the talk page) The Procrastinator 19:42, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry for reverting; I hadn't noticed that you had asked about it on the talk page. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 20:18, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Image sources
You recently uploaded Image:Giant Lip plate.gif, but only indicated "(From a university site)" as the source. You should include the exact source (i.e., the URL) on the image page, though unless the source has granted permission for its use, the image will be deleted anyway. Also, Image:Small ear stretch.jpg only has "From public domain. personal adds data base image" as its source. Where is the database, and did they explicitly state that their images are in the public domain? (Again, without details, the image will be deleted.) Same issue with Image:Modified girl.jpg, what is the site, and do they actually mention "public domain?" Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 21:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * 1) This The Surma picture can be found in various location around the net, they all presumably originated from an anthropological study years ago. It is costume that "sceinctific data" that undergoes peer review is in the public domain, it's prevalence may offer this as proof, though I'm not a legal expert.
 * 2) The dating site girl's pic I belive I got from www.okcupid.com, some months back, and kept a source of it.  As Far as I can tell ALL DATING SITES PICTURES are in puiblic domain, since anyone including the site's own promotional systems are using them without their direct concent.yet one should maybe check this site's explicit legal thingies..whichi coudl prove very tiredsome,and crippling if this is what wiki's protocol really are about
 * 3) The third one is of private resource I can assure it's free.(a freind's trip)
 * Wikipedia is very specific about citing its sources and only using properly licensed materials. You will have to be more specific about items 1 and 3. As for item 2, a copyright violation is a copyright violation, and material is not in the public domain based on one's opinion. Generally speaking, for a work to be in the public domain, it must be older than 1923, or a work of the U.S. government, or explicitly placed in the public domain by the owner. And the burden is on you, as the uploader, to justify such use when it isn't apparent (and in this case it isn't apparent at all). Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 22:12, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


 * the tat girl was taken in Real Life by a digital camera and brought to me personally, it is of no corporation property. If I take a picutre using my own camera of a person, do I need his permission ..?

scientific expediitons take picutres of tribes and then publish them all over the place, the surma picture is the same in so very many sites.,do you expect me to contact the original photographer ..?(which obviously releaed it into his university's hands and various publications) the ear stretch picture, is from www.okcupid.com a site that states he hold no responsibilyt for third party usage of personal adds pcitures -Is that good enough? This sound way to strict even for a real live publication.--Procrastinator@ talk2me 22:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

I belive non cannon pictures of non branded items may not necessitate a full detailed legal inqury..this could only render wikipedia as a text only site. no one would sue if the frog under frog is from "just some site"... :-) how do you usually resolve this ? The Procrastinator 22:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Various Body Modification Images
You have uploaded several images to articles related to body modification. None of the images have proper copyright information and I believe that you may have taken them from BME. Unless you can provide proper copyright information, those images are going to be deleted in short order. Also, the image on the clitoral piercing page is, as far as I can tell, a piercing of a clitoral hood piercing and I will remove it unless you can provide a better picture that actually illustrates the piercing going through the clitoris itself. If there is going to be a picture in the entry, it must be one that is useful to the reader, rather than one that is of an incorrect piercing. Glowimperial 00:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * My pictures are Not from BME, yet I put links to that Site's specific pages.

You are correct, please rectify my error and relocate it if there exist such an article. furthermore that picture is from the german Wikipedia, and licenning issues are resolved there. on Discussion on the the other pictures please see aboiove section.


 * I removed the image from the clitoris piercing page, as it was inaccurate (or not of particular use, given the lack of detail - a good photo for that entry would probably involve a pretty graphic close-up), and I see that you've moved the image to the correct page. Glad to see that you updated the license/copyright info on your other images, they have made good contributions to those entries.  Love the Purim carnival photo you found - the Purim carnivals that get put on in Los Angeles are probably nowhere near as interesting, they're mostly for kids here.  Glowimperial 18:21, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * thanks man. Yet I dont recall any Purim pictures, Puirm in israel is almost 2 full mothns into the future...-Procrastinator /talk2me 23:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * For some reason I thought you added the Purim carnival image to the body art page. I must be getting harebrained in my old age.  Now I can't remember what was on that page that I was going to fix.... Glowimperial 23:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * lol, it means you'r spending too much time here if anything..--Procrastinating@ talk2me 21:00, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

2030
Unfortunately, there is a lot of that sort of unsourced speculation on future year pages like 2030, 2010, 2050, etc. Most of them have no source provided at all, and clearly fall under Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so I have taken the tack of removing them. The solution is quite simple: provide a source for any speculation, and make sure it meets the criteria listed above. -- Kazrak 02:15, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The AI thingie is very well sourced obviously, yet upon removal of something that is beyond one's knowledge he should try to be very sure it is beyond reality as well,and Always put a remark mentioning and quoting the removed passege in the talk page. that is all I asked.   The Procrastinator 13:57, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

People's pictures
Hi! You raised a very good point, but I'm a bit loathe to upload photos of people I know, I've uploaded some photos of famous people who wouldn't mind like: Image:Rocket man - melbourne show 2005.jpg, Image:Stephanie smith human cannonball04 - melbourne show 2005.jpg, and I'll continue to look out for them. There are some good photos of people on Flickr, like this one which I think is great. Anyway thanks for your comment and I'll take it onboard. --Fir0002 02:28, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

buttons
Hi, I saw your query about Java buttons on another user's page... are you aware of this: User:Lupin/popups.js. Herostratus 06:44, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * okyy, what do I do with this source? what can it do for me ? why isn't more advanced buttonery an option in wiki ?

Your message
Would you mind going to my talk page and writing your message there using normal English? That means:


 * Not using capitals, use italic to emphasize, like this, not like This, or like THIS
 * Using space after comma, and not before

I am having hard time reading the message the way it is now. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 00:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

oww please commo'n,this is completely irelevant to the topic at hand...:-)

it's easier to Shift type to emphasize then to later mark and click italic. (for me, that is, you may wish to even coloring if you'd like to.

in actual articles I try my best to be tight though,in fixing other ppl's blunt reverts I do not. I can't believe you were actualyl offended by this untightness enough to comment me...lol :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diza (talk • contribs)


 * I just hate sloppy writing. There is something else, you need to fix the spacing after comma. The space goes after comma, and not before. These are all very important habits to use at all times, if you want to be a good editor. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 00:27, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Ok, I'll take that into future considerations.(Yet typo's are due to happen). please note my slight clarification in the article, and reword if neccesary. the current introduction is just not encyclopedic.
 * (I don't sign in my own talk page, other that comment here, should.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diza (talk • contribs)
 * You should sign on your talk page also, otherwise who can tell who wrote what? Note by the way that when you reply, you can make the text go a bit to the right, to make it easier to read.


 * I removed your text at integral, it is very clumsy. There is nothing wrong with saying that integral is a generalization of area. The word "generalization" is meant to imply that integral contains areas and volumes, etc, as particular cases. So your wording "depending on the problem...." is just a lengthy way of saying the same thing. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 00:48, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

An Integral is generalization of Sums, it mostly known for it's common attributes such as calculating area etc'. You may have knowledge of it's varient uses, but the article should state that these are mere cases of the more general thing. I find the current version confusing at best. it should read something like :" ..is generaliztion of sum over non discrete elements ..mostly used in calculating area.. etc. "---Procrastinator talk2me  01:16, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Please write your objections at talk:integral. We will see what people have to say. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:25, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Visual Basic Classic Wikibook
I replied to your question on my talk page. It's a long reply but the gist is that I'd be delighted to turn the book into the textbook you need but I'll need your assistance. --Kjwhitefoot 22:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Fermi Paradox and Collapsar power sources.
It's an interesting idea. Do you have a reference/citation for it? I'm not saying you're wrong, I just think it's a less common theory. --Beowulf314159 23:34, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Yes. How about $$E=MC^2$$ ? Dyson spheres are the equivalent of the futile past attempts to calculate the age of the sun judging it's "burin" time as a huge space bound chunk of coal would. This was later reverted to it's current estimation after discovering neuclear fusion. The best matter to energy convertion possible(In our non allien physics,that is) is from Matter antmi matter anihilation and or a mini singularities. Not EM power. -- Procrastinating @ talk2me 23:46, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Moved to talk page

Image copyright problem with Image:Warptable.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Warptable.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 00:42, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I believe "Fair use" should be the template. This hand drawn curve was only an example of the theoretical fuiture technology,and shoudl be viewed as such. I didn't see your message(and since this picture was uploaded 8 months ago ago..) in time so it was deleted - Please bring it back with this tag. thanks. --Procrastinating@ talk2me 13:50, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The image is still there... and if you did draw it it isnt fair use, it would be PD-self or GFDL-self or one of the Creative Commons licenses. --Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 16:56, 28 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I did not. It could be considered a logo, for the conceptual fictional drive. if you believe another licence is on order, please feel free to edit it. I dont know much about the slgiht differences.
 * Ok, I updated the page, you have to add the rationale to the fair use tags ;) --Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 17:43, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Displaying pi
Um, are you aware that Macrakis reverted your first change? You may want to discuss it on the talk page. Personally, I don't really care, but still. Cheers, Melchoir 23:01, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

10x,I'll move it as a suggestion on the talk page, join me there.--Procrastinating@ talk2me 10:14, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

(I'm also posting this on the Talk:Pi page.) You ask why I reverted your change. Tex formulae don't display well in-line. In fact, inline images in general don't render well, especially cross-browser -- it is hard to get baselines to align and character sizes to be consistent with text. What is more, you can't change their size by changing your browser text size. Tex formulae are especially problematic for a single character, because it will be in Tex's choice of font, rather than a font that is consistent with the rest of the text. Another (more minor) problem is that you can cut and paste text reliably if it has inline images. --Macrakis 15:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Milgram experiment
In your recent edit to this article, you stated "(Which is more than fatal to humans of all sizes)". This is inaccurate. Voltage is a measurement of the ability to do work; it's not a measure of the current. You could theoretically have a 10,000 volt shock hit you and hardly feelt it, if the amps are very low. Thus, I removed your st statement. All the best, --Durin 19:44, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Village_pump_%28miscellaneous%29
I've responded to your comment at the VP; here. Thanks. JesseW, the juggling janitor 20:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

טכניון
הי,

באיזה סמסטר אתה נמצא כרגע? אני עושה שם כרגע תואר בפיסיקה ב"שלט רחוק". כלומר, מגיע רק למבחנים. Q uant 23:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC) גם אני לא נוכח ברוב ההרצאות, ולמען האמת הניהליזם הזה שנובע מחוסר המצאות פיזיקת בקמפוס גורם לי להיו תער בשעות שכאלו. שזה די חמור. צריך מסגרת....אני סמסמטר 3+, ביחד עם מדעי המחשב. איזה אתה ? איך אתה משלים חומר ?(הוידאו לא טוב לכל מקצוע) יש לך תכנת מסרים מידיים ? סקייפ?

בערך סמסטר שלוש-ארבע. עוד לא פתרתי את הבעיה של לימודים מרחוק. יש תוכנה, אבל אני רוצה כבר ללכת לישון. משתדל לשמור כמה שיותר על מסגרת, כי אחרת באמת שקשה ללמוד לבד. בעיקר אם אתה ADD כמוני. ראה: he:הפרעת קשב ריכוז והיפראקטיביות Q uant 23:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

סקייפ אין, כי אני משתמש במחשב שמשמש גם לצרכי עבודה. אני אשלח לך את מס' הטלפון שלי בדואר. אתה מוזמן תמיד להתקשר.

תוכל לשלוח אלי הודעת דואר? אני חושב שאין לי את הכתובת שלך. תודה. Q uant 23:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Censorship
A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much.Loom91 18:07, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I see not vote in progress, and the current discussion is WAY to long for me to read through.

when a quintessential version of the proposed guideline be released, I'll gladlly show my liberal views. --Procrastinating@ talk2me 22:48, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the compliments. I sincerely hope that the Hebrew Wikipedia fixes its bureaucracy issues, as that might revive the project, which is currently being beaten by just about every Wikipedia (Russian Wikipedia, for example, has about twice as many articles now, although it had less about a year ago). -- Ynhockey (Talk) 12:53, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

They keep doing it
תראה את זה תביט בהיסטורייה, כמובן.,:
 * I dont really fucking care, they may choose to collectivelly be as disconnected and self illussioned as possible regarding the current and future value of that project. If any I find it an interesting note to the self propefating tendecy of conformity to power.--Procrastinating@ talk2me 23:57, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

OMGP
Thanks Diza! Just curious: is "liberal agnostic Physics and Computer science" very different from traditional Physics and Computer science? ;) -Ste|vertigo 16:34, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * lol :)
 * it actually states i'm a liberal and agnostic person who also studies Physics and CS...thuslly:
 * I'm a 24 y.o liberal agnostic student of Physics and Computer science in the Technion of Israel.
 * I'll try to revise it, yet i'm not sure how..--Procrastinating@ talk2me 18:25, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Fermi Paradox
About two and half weeks ago you mentioned you might want to help out with Fermi Paradox. I have been trying to no avail to gather comments on the talk page. It was just de-featured today. I thought you might want to head back there and make some comments on the issues raised on talk. Thanks, Marskell 06:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * What issues, specifically ..? it just grew too large and combaluded, reenhancing each side note to a semi article.. If you need specific help I'll do my best.--Procrastinating@ talk2me 23:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

AfD
I saw you contributed to the Ohad Shem-Tov (talk) page, which I have proposed to be deleted, feel free to join in the debate here! C mon 21:09, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you. it's done. --Procrastinating@ talk2me 22:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Ich bin expert
There you go - your user page finally received the much-needed attention from an expert on the subject.

(I don't claim to be the number one expert of wiki syntax, but it's better than nothing.)

Have fun.

P.S.: And while we're at it - may i ask to reconsider your vote about Ohad Shem-Tov? If you want freedom and democracy, you should help promoting people who fight for it and not delete articles about them claiming that they're non-notable. They guy came very very close to the Knesset ...--Amir E. Aharoni 20:34, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * lol about fixing my userpage...How delightfully professional of you, being an expert of Me.
 * Some factual data:
 * They got 47000 votes, which is half of what was needed to be "close". closer than most
 * There is no article about number #1 and #2 in the list. i know - so write them!
 * I AM an activist. it figures. I was a mashkif for קנ at a kalpi, but voted טב, 'cuz i'm a bloody fascist
 * I used to date number 7. she's a cutie
 * Do you study a language/lingustics? --84.228.7.71 20:33, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Yes. I study/studied: Structural linguistics, Indo-European studies, Lithuanian, Latin, Amharic, Italian and Jewish Italian.

If you stop writing a space before a comma, your life will change.--Amir E. Aharoni 21:10, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm a Grammar Nazi
I see that you noticed my silly little en-3 joke.

It's your user page, so leave it as you wish. However, consistently writing a frikking space before a comma is more than "fast typing and typos" and I would recommend you to train yourself not to do it if you want to look "near-native". Besides ,in Wikipedia fast typing is not an excuse - you can always fix everything you write.

Those would be my last words on the issue.

N.B.: I write "i" with a small letter intentionally.--Amir E. Aharoni 21:23, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I see you are so indeed. Though Fashism and National Socilasim are frequently confused...Nazis are so much more photogenic.
 * Writing a small "i" infuriates me ,to the point of no return ,forcing me to intentionally use comma-space pharsing the way God All Mighty had meant it to be used.
 * Hagar's cuteness is only shrouded by her fucking crazy unbelievable discombobulated view of the world.


 * In that case - i hope that she's the next number 2 ... or 1.--Amir E. Aharoni 17:23, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * lol, you don't know what you'r talking about. I was saying this in an uncharectarstic negative way. AleY center reason for not using this election, as the Gimlaim did, was they lack the orginizational skills for it. Mostt of the list is just too Satlanim to actually make a change. I was brought to this empricial knowledge against my will to believe otherwise. You can see my messeges in their forums, even before the elections stating just that..
 * so, do you study linguistics in TA, or not ?


 * God forbid. Read my Hebrew user page to see what i think about Tel Aviv. Whatever i say there about Gush Dan includes the University too.
 * I study in HUJI.
 * And, if we're talking shameless racism - i think that Jews and Italians are much more photogenic than Germans. But of course it's a matter of taste.
 * When i met some people from the קנ list i was indeed unpleasantly surprised to find out that most of them are just satlanim...--Amir E. Aharoni 08:08, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Furthermore:
 * They do throw great pot parties, though.
 * Check out #2 in the list video.

!!@#!!!מזל טוב אח שלי גבר מלך עולם על שמצאת אהבה ראוייה ועל המיסוד הקרוב.  Procrastinating@ talk2me
 * אתה שולתתת!!!


 * Thanks.
 * Shlomi Sandak (still red?) looks like the biggest satlan, the satla-guru. I almost convinced someone to vote קנ, but then he checked the list and said that although number 1 looks eligible, number 2 is a joke. Eventually he voted for Uzi Dayan.
 * I don't care about parties, i'm a complete hnun in those matters. I like Ale Yarok not because of drugs or parties, but because i'm libertarian/environmentalist/anarchist and they are the closest to this. In matters of Eretz-Yisrael, however, i'm an uncompromising fascist, so unfortunately i can't vote for them. But i did convince a few people to do so.
 * As for the grammar matters, it's really just a friendly advice: If you check your spelling and punctuation better, people will have less reasons to think that you are a troll and then you'll have more space to do damage as you wish :)
 * I don't dare to write a small "i" in articles, only in personal writing. --Amir E. Aharoni 13:42, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I was never Ever accused of being a "troll". Not even in the hebrew wiki. Those alleged allegations came months after my departure as a general bad language tone. Many trolls (as I already reffered you to before) were accused of being such retrospectivally without even the accidental vandal act of their part.(besides not agreeing publically with a content edit of an agree admin). Asbl attempt of translating the wiki rule book to hebrew caused Gilgamesh and his freinds to block him and call him a troll.(The rules stating they cant do as they please etc', so they erased them from his user space..)
 * They really like to bundle you up with Haham Hanuka and other alleged troublemakers ... but i guess that you know that.
 * As for Asbl and Quant - they drafted me to their group. Their allegations against the administrators' junta were legitimate (though not necessarily correct). Their actions, however, were too personal anti-Gilgamesh. And i really don't think that Gilgamesh is so evil. So i wasn't very active in their group. But since then i regularly vote in the "parliament", which is kinda fun.
 * To put it short: I just try to distance myself from all this troll vs. administrator bullshit and write articles. And i try not to get into a revert war if i can't prove my point with sources. That's the golden middle path, it works for me quite well and i enjoy this Wikipedia thing. You really should do the same. --Amir E. Aharoni 14:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * That is what I do. so did Asbl(which has a Phd in EE, and was still reverted on his own topics..). Yet. what if some admin would write utter nonsense of an unsourced type in a linguistic relataed article you wrote, refuse to source him self, delete the actual request for sourcing, revert your edits, and protect the page/block you for not being prudent with his..? you simply have'nt faced that dilema yet. no one was looking for a fight, they simply shune their own rules. I recall a request for source in the midst of a long debate with Gilgmaesh, when a source was given(to prove him wrong) he reverted the talk page to look rehtorical("..then prove your self right!") and then blocked the user(using this or that allegations..I dont even recall what). You just dont know what you'r facing...you're assuming good faith.


 * That haven't yet happened on linguistics-related articles and i doubt that it will happen anytime soon, because the heb wp is such a disaster in the area of linguistics that it can't get any worse and no one seems to care.


 * So yes, it can be said that i assume good faith :)


 * Also, you write: "I recall a request for source in the midst of a long debate with Gilgmaesh, when a source was given(to prove him wrong) he reverted the talk page to look rehtorical("..then prove your self right!")"


 * Can you prove yourself right, i.e. give a link to this conversation (history)? You got me curious.--Amir E. Aharoni 14:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * P.S.: Besides, i've got the impression that the administrators mostly fight users in the fields of politics, religion, history, math and CS, and i rarely edit anything there (except Scientology, in which D.S. more or less supported me).--Amir E. Aharoni 15:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I think the user was michelle. nicked Blondy. I dont recall. Yet these cases are not rare, they simply get erased from history as to not be visible transgressions when asked for. sometimes the article is not reverted but deleted, in that case nobody has access to it anymore (except for the admin). just watch his actions, every 2-5 days there's something of that nature that is hushed down. I dont follow anymore, but I'll let you know.
 * Do you ICQ/skype ?


 * Ah, right ... Blondy is the one that is usually mentioned on the same breath with Diza :)
 * I just don't get this fanatical anti-Gilgamesh stance, that some heb wp users proclaim. He wrote a lot of good articles and quite often he's really nice and helpful, i even saw that he was nice to you on certain occasions.
 * Try Skype later today - have a guess at the username. --Amir E. Aharoni 16:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)