User talk:DizzinessOfFreedom

April 2018
Your recent editing history at Michael Behe shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''I understand your concerns, but Wikipedia works on a consensus model for edits. When you make a change to an article that gets reverted, you need to start discussing the changes on the article talk page, not reverting over and over, especially with multiple editors. That is not helpful, and you can end up blocked from further edits and/or the page protected to stop disruption. The 3RR limit is a hard limit on all pages, meaning if you revert more than 3 times in a 24 hour period, you almost certainly will end up blocked. Please revert back to the earlier consensus view and start a discussion on the article talk page. Reading some of Wikipedia's policy pages, especially WP:NPOV and exactly what that means may be helpful.''  Ravensfire  (talk) 22:19, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Feser, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages City Journal and The American ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Edward_Feser check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Edward_Feser?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Most Holy Trinity Seminary


A tag has been placed on Most Holy Trinity Seminary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://mostholytrinityseminary.org/whoweare.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JC7V -constructive zone  03:14, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Article
I've fixed up the Most Holy Trinity Seminary article and removed the copy paste violations and added a few sources. I've also removed the CSD tag. If you have any questions or need help, don't hestitate to ask me or someone else (help desk, teahouse). cheers.JC7V -constructive zone  06:05, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pope Francis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 18:35, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

I don't need to cite a source when it is evident DizzinessOfFreedom (talk) 18:55, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually, you do. That's how encyclopedias and, more specifically, Wikipedia work. Information that is not cited can be removed by editors at any given time. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 03:08, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Pope Francis, you may be blocked from editing. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 19:33, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Most Holy Trinity Seminary for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Most Holy Trinity Seminary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Most Holy Trinity Seminary& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SJK (talk) 14:41, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

POV issues
I'm concerned that your editing on topics related to the Catholic Church are in violation of the site's WP:NPOV policy. I would recommend you review that page as well as the one on reliable sources. You may also want to gain some more editing experience in different areas of the project. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 23:46, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

February 2019
Please refrain from using talk pages such as User Talk:Goodone121 for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 17:42, 11 February 2019 (UTC)