User talk:Dj.acidic

Welcome

 * }

Speedy deletion nomination of DJ Acidic


A tag has been placed on DJ Acidic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tha Master of Hypeness


A tag has been placed on Tha Master of Hypeness requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. NtheP (talk) 17:39, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Your article creations
Hi, a few of the articles you've created have been deleted now, and I wanted to give you some explanation about why. We have a policy on notability which says that to be appropriate for Wikipedia, each article must be about a notable topic. This means a topic that was written about in reliable sources, is important to society, has substantial media coverage, and the like. So far the articles you've created haven't contained any evidence that their topics are notable, or even that they're important in any way, and they've been deleted as being inappropriate for Wikipedia for that reason.

In addition, I notice that you appear to be creating articles about yourself and your recordings. This is something we discourage people from doing due to how difficult it is to write objectively about oneself. Please read our notability and conflict-of-interest guidelines before continuing to create articles. If you still feel, after that, like your articles could be written in a way that would make them suitable for wikipedia, I would recommend that you use our articles for creation process, where more experienced users will help you polish the articles and bring them up to our standards. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:57, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

A page you started (Acidic Fitness) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Acidic Fitness, Dj.acidic!

Wikipedia editor Prof tpms just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thank you for the kind contribution to Wikipedia. Please add suitable images to this page. Regards."

To reply, leave a comment on Prof tpms's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Acidic Fitness for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Acidic Fitness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Acidic Fitness until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greek Legend (talk) 11:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)