User talk:Djandband

Proposed deletion of Saurabh Lamsal


The article Saurabh Lamsal has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable vanity page of a sixteen year old boy. The "Givemesport Youth Writer of the Year 1013/2014" award does not even come close to representing the "well-known and significant award or honor" required by WP:ANYBIO and a few internet searches reveal this person is long way off meeting the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bellerophon talk to me  18:21, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Saurabh Lamsal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saurabh Lamsal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Saurabh Lamsal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bellerophon talk to me  15:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Onside Goal.com
Hello Djandband,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Onside Goal.com for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. SStephens13 (talk • contribs) 10:07, 16 April 2015 (UTC)