User talk:Djc wi

To start a new message, click "New section" at the top of the page and follow the instructions.

To reply to an existing message, click "Edit" at the top of the page, find the comment, place an extra colon, and state your message.

Example:

This article should be changed. ~



~

Kyoto Electronics
Hi. Thank you for patrolling  new pages. I'm just  wondering  why  you  passed Kyoto Electronics as patrolled rather than tag it as needing  reliable third party sources, or as an advertisement. At first  glance it could even be a possible WP:CSD and a suspected case of block  evasion by User talk:Pvt.Billinghurst. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:47, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

More
Me again. Sorry to  badger you but  I  came across a few more items: I would think  there are still  a few things about  NPP you're not  quite sure about. Quality of patrolling  is far more important  than speed, so if you're not  sure what  to  do  about  an article, it's perfectly  OK to  give it  a miss and leave it  for another patroller. Patrolling isn't  just  looking  foor articles to  delete, it's also  very  much  about  putting  the right maintenance  tags on them so they  get  noticed and improved by  the creator or other editors if the patroller is unable to  fix them. My suggestion  is that  you  read the latest  recently  updated page at  WP:NPP, because we've added a lot  more advice to  it, and if you  still  get  stuck, just come over to  my  talk  page and tell me about  it. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:14, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Michelle Defraites COPYVIO
 * Trapball passed and not tagged at  all  until  it  was PRODed by  another editor
 * Turner Middle School passed, untagged.
 * Hi there. I will admit that I have passed a few pages that shouldn't have been passed.  Some of the pages I pass are pages that are so strange that I just don't know what to do with them, since some pages like that don't fall under a speedy deletion criterion.  I will be more careful in the future about marking pages as patrolled.  --Djc wi (talk) 06:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Amanda roadmen
i dont understand? why isn't that significant? She's a very well known model ........ extremely well known actually and upcoming actress! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanda9909 (talk • contribs) 07:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * First, I ask that you please read the instructions for my talk page before using it. They're at the top.  Secondly, the issue is not with the subject of the article.  It is with the article itself.  Even if she is a well-known model, how is someone who has never heard of her (such as myself) supposed to know this.  That is the first and second issue.  The article is unreferenced and, thus, its notability is in question.  The other issues are less important than these two.  Do you need help with the process of providing references? --Djc wi (talk) 07:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You do not have forever to improve the article. I've been waiting for a response from you for 30 minutes.  If you do not communicate with me or improve the article yourself, it will be nominated for deletion under Criterion A7. --Djc wi (talk) 07:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It looks like you waited too long. Someone has nominated the article for deletion.  Luckily for you, though, it is a proposed deletion, which takes about 7 days, as opposed to an A7 speedy deletion, which can take as short as an hour.  If I were you, I would improve the article now.  If you need help, you can always message me.  When the article is done, it should meet this criteria.  If it doesn't, it will be re-nominated for deletion.  --Djc wi (talk) 08:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

See WP:VRS for the basic idea.  Chzz  ► 08:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

First off ..... I AM NOT AMANDA ROADMEN, I never claimed to be either. So i did NOT "create an article about myself" I have created SEVERAL different models/actresses/actors pages on here ..... and i have never ever been accused or confronted about it. I don't know what your problem is. If it gets deleted, i'll just create a new one. :) goodluck getting them all deleted ;) Amanda Roadmen is a well known model who's also a beauty pageant winner, there are atleast over 200 women on here who have wikepedias that have won beauty pageants ..... I didn't do anything wrong and FYI almost every model/actor or someone that represents them creates a wikepedia page you obviously don't know shit about the entertainment business you're just a little wikepedia nerd who thinks they know everything, Like I said .... get it deleted and i'll just make a new one ...and ill keep creating new ones until one sticks ;) and don't bother blocking my IP or internet sever IP because I have plenty of net servers and plenty of computers ;) so keep that in mind sweet cheeks! tata! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanda9909 (talk • contribs) 08:21, 28 May 2011


 * User warned for the above personal attack.  Chzz  ►  08:28, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

StormFerrari
Re.

How do I make my page look like the ones you linked me to? I cant seem to find like a template or easy way to do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StormFerrari (talk • contribs) 07:36, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment @ Djc_wi - I responded to this, a bit, on User talk:StormFerrari.  Chzz  ► 07:46, 28 May 2011 (UTC)


 * How does it look now? I added references etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StormFerrari (talk • contribs) 08:12, 28 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh and thank you so much for your great help. How do I add a picture to my article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by StormFerrari (talk • contribs) 08:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC)



Dorianjamesvary
II removed the warning I placed on Dorianjamesvary's talk page as I realised afterwards that the link was relevant and spotted your new user tag, as such I felt the warring was not appropriate. Is it againt the guidelines to remove warnings you have placed yourself in error? --Wintonian (talk) 09:44, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Removing your comment was an honest mistake. I did not check to see who put it there and assumed it was Dorianjamesvary.  However, if I'm not mistaken, links to Facebook pages are not appropriate for Wikipedia.  --Djc wi (talk) 09:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah ok, I was just a bit confused, mind you I make mistakes all the time. Offical links are normaly ok in the external links section see: WP:ELOFFICIAL. --Wintonian (talk) 09:56, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for the clarification. --Djc wi (talk) 10:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Half past four
Hello Djc wi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Half past four, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''There are some references and there is the movie soundtrack. Together it makes enough of a credible claim to notability to pass A7.''' Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:34, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Claire Myers
You removed a speedy deletion tag (G3) saying "not blatant enough"--and the article said the subject lives "with Myley cyrus and Joseph Smith, Jr." on some island, sourced to this. Please look before you leap. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 04:40, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

SD removal
Care to explain? it is clearly not encyclopedic. C T J F 8 3 07:42, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree, but it is also not spam as it was tagged. Quite frankly, I don't think the article meets any speedy deletion criteria.  I think that a proposed deletion or move as suggested on the page would be more appropriate. --Djc wi (talk) 07:44, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Fine! I'll take it to AfD...it doesn't belong on a user subpage either, WP:NOTWEBHOST C T J F 8 3  07:46, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Userspace subpages
It is only because you have been a productive contributor in the past that I'm giving you a chance at this.

Those userspace subpages you have, about the "New Mainstream" and such? Either that's fiction, or they're so low-profile that they're impossible to find any evidence of. Either way, it's unacceptable to have this on Wikipedia. I'll give you a week to come back, notice this warning, and then either fix those or add to them (thereby marking them for deletion). If you haven't done so by the end of a week, I'll delete 'em anyway. DS (talk) 16:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Rick Jeschke Deliz
I noticed you contributed to this page, well, by tagging it for speedy delete. It is up at AFD and wanted to pass that on. Dennis Brown (talk) 23:11, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Kerrie Roberts
You seem rather inactive so I got WP:BOLD. I was starting an article on her when a google search found the article in your sandbox. I made some updates and enhancements before moving the article to article space. I just moved the album article that you had worked up. I knew it was time to write an article for her so I was pleased to find that you had done most of the legwork. Thank you!  Royal broil  05:16, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
The page ForeverRedeemed/F.R.E.E. (band) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be blatant advertising which only promotes something, and which is unlikely to be suitable for an article (or at best would need a fundamental rewrite). Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion of anything, whether a company, product, group, service, person, religious or political belief, or anything else. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:41, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

TB
-- 76.65.130.165 (talk) 00:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yellow Cavalier (EP)


The article Yellow Cavalier (EP) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable EP from a band that later changed names and is notable. Only reference is to an empty database entry.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wrench in the Works


The article Wrench in the Works has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A disbanded band, which appears to lack WP:NMUSIC.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I am One of Many (talk) 18:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dishes (EP)


The article Dishes (EP) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability per WP:NALBUMS, and not even an assertion of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:22, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adios (Flynn Adam EP)


The article Adios (Flynn Adam EP) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability per WP:NALBUMS, and not even an assertion of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:22, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Such a Time


The article Such a Time has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability per WP:NALBUMS, and not even an assertion of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:23, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of We Are The Becoming for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article We Are The Becoming is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/We Are The Becoming until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Jonnie and Brookie.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jonnie and Brookie.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Jonnie and Brookie performing.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jonnie and Brookie performing.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hyland Polyphonic Telegraph No. 1.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Hyland Polyphonic Telegraph No. 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Poema (musical group) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poema (musical group) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Poema (musical group) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Reflection (The Rubyz album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reflection (The Rubyz album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Reflection (The Rubyz album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ficaia (talk) 11:53, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Rubyz Reflection.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Rubyz Reflection.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)