User talk:Djennin2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jon Ossoff (February 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Quasar G. was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Djennin2/sandbox/Jon Ossoff and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Quasar G. (talk) 22:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Djennin2/sandbox/Jon Ossoff


Hello, Djennin2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Jon Ossoff".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

msg.ai
If you want to see how to write an appropriate, neutral article, look at something like OpenDataSoft.

Your article still reads more like a sales brochure than an encyclopedia article.

Things you need to drop from it include:
 * Everything like the second sentence which just reads like a sales pitch extolling the virtues of the product(s)
 * The overuse of name-dropping lists of clients
 * phrases like "made headlines", "vast improvement", "quickly tapped by"

Honestly look at the example I gave and notice it doesn't do any of that. That's how your article should be.

Do you have a connection with this company? If so that can make it difficult to be objective, as WP:COI explains. -- Begoon 05:36, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Alright, I understand your point - the only reason for the "made headlines" line was because I was mimicking Deep Mind's page. I think I've addressed it correctly. Removed the sales pitch language, reduced the client "name dropping" to those that have better sourcing, and only used the offending phrases when it was appropriate. Djennin2
 * It's better now, so I made a few further changes and removed the 'advert' tag. You didn't answer my question about having a connection with this company. You're not in any way compelled to answer, but I'm interested, nevertheless. -- Begoon 23:38, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, sorry - didn't notice that. No, I'm not affiliated with them. I AM affiliated with Y Combinator, which is why I know about them at all.. but mostly just wanted to do more with wiki and this seemed an easy one-off. Djennin2

Nomination of Jim F. Barksdale for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim F. Barksdale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jim F. Barksdale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 12:00, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Msgai logo.png


The file File:Msgai logo.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)