User talk:Djezonfly

Welcome!

 * }

tennis
do u want me to add the results in rogers cup or do u want it to do? :D-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 15:23, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

hey
i saw ur edits on tennis and i think u deserve this barnstar

Chelsey Gullickson
Where did you get her WTA ranking as 385? http://www.sonyericssonwtatour.com/page/Player/Stats/0,,12781~13327,00.html says she is unranked. She won the 2010 NCAA Women's Tennis Championship but does she play tournaments with WTA points? http://www.sonyericssonwtatour.com/page/Player/Activity/0,,12781~13327,00.html says she got 1 point in 2010 (for a first round qualification loss) and none in 2009. A player must earn points in 3 tournaments in the last year to be ranked. Her page may get many hits when she plays Wozniacki in the US Open first round so I would like to sort this out before then. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:48, 29 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for fixing it. The false stats matched the current number 385: . PrimeHunter (talk) 01:35, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

ASB Classic
Why did you remove sources stating that a player has a wildcard as you did here KnowIG (talk) 14:06, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well you really don't get wikipedia then. :sighs: KnowIG (talk) 14:14, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Deletion nominations
As a regular contributor to one of the five articles I have nominated, you might be interested in commenting on the following deletion discussion on ATP/WTA Tour qualifying articles: Articles for deletion/2011 ASB Classic – Singles Qualifying --Pretty Green (talk) 15:14, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Fed Cup
Hey, why did you took out the Estonian and Spanish squad? Pelmeen10 (talk) 16:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2011 Cellular South Cup – Doubles


A tag has been placed on 2011 Cellular South Cup – Doubles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. EBE123(talk | Contribs) 19:35, 12 February 2011 (UTC)


 * You have new messages at EBE123(talk | Contribs) 19:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)'s talk page. And remember to sign your posts.
 * EBE123(talk | Contribs) 19:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I coulden't understand. EBE123(talk | Contribs) 19:47, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Alina Abdurakhimova for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alina Abdurakhimova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alina Abdurakhimova until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Senator2029 ║  talk  15:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)