User talk:Djinni19

Your edits violate a number of Wikipedia policies, and have been reverted. Your edits are non-neutral, non-academic statements and depend heavily on primary sources which are against the policies of verifiability and no original research, in addition to undue weight. Please stop going against Wikipedia's policies. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 21:40, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Your edits have been reverted again. Primary source material is not generally acceptable according to the no original research policy because it can be interpreted in many ways.  There is also the undue weight policy which limits the amount of space dedicated to Baha'i views.  Note that Wikipedia is not a Baha'i encyclopedia and should not be used to promote the Baha'i Faith.  You would not see such quotes in any academic encyclopedia. If you continue breaking these rules you can be blocked from editing.  Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 11:26, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Dear Jeff,

The "World Government" article includes quotations from the primary sources of other relevant historical figures (quotes which are equally if not more open to interpretation) and hence I deemed it informative to include a similar source from Bahá'u'lláh as well. This would be fully in line with the logic and style of the other entries on the page. I fully understand and support the Wikipedia undue weight and original research policies and, indeed, have no intention to violate them. I am sorry for any unintentional violation. No Bahá'í propaganda whatsoever has been intended at any point. I understand if Wikipedia does not wish to use quotations from primary sources but if this is really the case, this policy is not upheld systematically since Wikipedia is replete with articles with primary source quotes. Moreoever, I am in possession of several high-standard academic encyclopedia and, indeed, all of them include short quotes here and there.

Best regards, Djinni19


 * That other articles or parts of articles don't abide by the policies does not make it correct to further make the articles non-abiding. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 18:20, 11 June 2010 (UTC)