User talk:Djinnov8

Wicked Waiata
I have added a "" template to the article Wicked Waiata, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. gadfium 22:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

JWs
Your recent participation at Beliefs and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses was likely intended with the best interests of the Wikipedia community in mind. However, an editor cannot remove information and sources simply because the editor personally disagrees with what they say. It would be better to refute by citing a verifiable source. In the event that a solid source (or preponderance of sources) explicitly contradicts a weak or questionable source (or a questionable interpretation of a source), then the editor should record that in a Talk thread and refer/link to that Talk thread in the short comment accompanying his deletion of the removed material and source.

--AuthorityTam (talk) 15:30, 21 May 2010 (UTC)