User talk:Djkcel

June 2015
Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nero Burning ROM, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 19:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, I'm. Thanks for attempting to improve Microsoft Access article. Unfortunately, Wikipedia cannot accept your contribution because it is based on a potentially unreliable source. A reliable source has three foundations: (1) Reputable author, (2) reputable publisher that provides editorial oversight, and (3) good contents. In case of your source, I am afraid all three are missing. The author cannot be identified; he could be just anybody. There is no way to verify his credentials. Editorial oversight is completely absent in Quora post. Finally, the message talks about a non-existent Office 2014! I don't think that counts as high-quality content.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 07:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Hey there, thanks for the friendly info! Sorry for the substandard source, but it's good to know for next time.  The problem with describing the development side of proprietary software like Access is that the company isn't always going to divulge that kind of information, so sources might be tough to come across and your best bet might be conjecture. Djkcel (talk) 20:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)


 * How very true! Except betting and wagering of all kind is forbidden in Wikipedia!
 * We can't know everything, can we? But don't worry; there is plenty that we know. We just need more editors to write those things, and write them in a professional style, so that the article becomes Featured Articles!
 * Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 09:22, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Kenny Drew Jr. revert
I'm wondering why you reverted quite a bit of work that I did on Kenny Drew Jr. If you read entries on WP about other musicians, you'll find that I edited the labels consistently: full name first, then piped on later appearances. –Vmavanti (talk) 17:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * That was partly in error...I was just meaning to revert your deletion of the last line, which I re-added with better sources. I'll merge our changes together in a bit.  Thanks. Djkcel (talk) 18:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Death Race
Ur name’s awesome so I’m curious if u hav death race films on fre internet becuz I hav questions about vague events?(71.145.233.12 (talk) 00:15, 4 April 2021 (UTC)).

June 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at SPL II: A Time for Consequences, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 06:37, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Bro, are you actually serious with this? Watch both movies and listen to the musical theme that plays after the scenes I described. How do you actually want me to source the same musical theme being played in two movies aside from listing the timings of the scenes? The fact that you're accusing a perfectly valid mention of continuity as "disruptive editing" calls into question your very understanding both of how good faith editing and relevant content work. Djkcel (talk) 07:30, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Did Wikipedia hire you as a film critic? No. Wikipedia is built on WP:SECONDARY sources; it is supposed to be a summary of reliable published sources. If published sources did not describe this continuity situation, then why do you think it is important enough for you to analyze and map out? Take another look at WP:No original research, which is what I warned you against. If you are the one who is making the distinction, it is original research. Binksternet (talk) 07:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)