User talk:Djm1279/Archive 3

This covers period from November 2006 to June 2007

Runcorn
Danny. I agree with what you say on the Runcorn Talk page; the article is a mess. I am new to Wikipedia and did not know what to expect but was certainly surprised to see the content of this page. I have already had to revert quite a bit of vandalism. Why not have a go at some of it yourself? Only I should be grateful if you could leave the bits I have added - History after 1656, the population table, the photo, the References and the Further reading. Much of the rest could (should?) go in my opinion - most of sections 5 to 12. What do you think? PS I live in Runcorn. Peter I. Vardy 21:04, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Gatewayatman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gatewayatman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:23, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Busrt662.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Busrt662.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 03:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Sshtmsa2.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sshtmsa2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Runcorn (again)
Following encouragement from  DDStretch , the leader of WikiProject Cheshire, (see Talk:Runcorn), and yourself of course, I have more or less completely re-written the page on Runcorn. I hope you find this to be an improvement - and I hope I've not messed up any of your contributions. This latest version follows as closely as I could the advice given at WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements. What do you think? Peter I. Vardy 15:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Danny. Thanks for your message. I have had some further encouragement and suggestions on Talk:Runcorn.  Meanwhile best of luck with the A levels - much more important at this stage of life than Wiki-ing! Peter I. Vardy 09:29, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Danny. The news is that the latest version of Runcorn has been assessed as a Good Article.  Thanks for your stimulation in this respect.  Hope the A-levels are going OK.  Best wishes.  Peter I. Vardy 19:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:YPRcard.JPG
Good job adding the photo - but I thought it might be a good idea for you to obscure your name/signature? Obviously this is your decision, just thought I should mention it... --Jim (Talk) 09:14, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:YPRcard2a.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:YPRcard.JPG. The copy called Image:YPRcard.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 14:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Citéeuropelogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Citéeuropelogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Etap2.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Etap2.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Etap1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Etap1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:NoctLogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:NoctLogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:33, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Keelelog.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Keelelog.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:38, 4 June 2007 (UTC)