User talk:Djmarkgallo

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snowysusan (talk) 21:30, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:28, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

The Amigo and Dizz show
Hi Djmarkgallo. Thanks for following up with me about your article. I note that you indicate you are trying to get your show "listed" on Wikipedia and I have no doubt that it's a terrific show, but Wikipedia is not a webhosting site or a directory - it's an encyclopedia. So in order for a subject to have it's own encyclopedia page it must meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability (please click on the word notability and read this help section). The two comments left by reviewers indicate this:


 * Thanks for your submission but you will need to cite sources that are independent of your subject to establish notability. In other words, what other sources have discussed, reviewed, raved about your subject? If there are news articles or other published sources you will need to refer to them to improve your submission.  All the best. Snowysusan (talk) 21:30, 14 October 2012 (UTC)}}


 * The CBS article only has a passing mention that the death was discussed on the show; you need independent, substantive coverage that notes the significance of this show. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:28, 25 October 2012 (UTC)}}

In order to establish notability there must be significant independent, reliable sources that write about your show. So the sources must not be connected to your show (ie. the station's website, facebook, twitter, press releases, interviews with the hosts of the show, etc). These sources may be used to support information in the article, but they will not be considered helpful to establish notability because they are not independent of the subject. If a subject is notable reliable third party sources will have written about it and these are the sources you will need to include so that the notability of your show can be verified (for example, newspaper articles, magazines, industry reviews, awards received, etc).

If such sources don't exist it may be that your show just isn't suitable for an encyclopedia article but is more suited to other types of sites that permit promotional articles. Wikipedia strictly forbids promotional articles or advertising. See "What Wikipedia is Not".

Finally, writing about yourself or a subject you are closely connected with may be a problem. Wikipedia has a policy regarding conflicts of interest. Encyclopedia articles must be objective - written from a neutral point of view but I think you have done a reasonably good job in this regard.

Your show does indeed sound like a lot of fun and worth tuning into, but it simply may not be a suitable topic for an encyclopedia article. If you can locate independent, reliable sources sufficient to establish notability, though, please feel free to revise the article and resubmit it for review. I would be happy to look at it again for you.

Best Regards,Snowysusan (talk) 06:48, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Amigo and Dizz concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Amigo and Dizz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:33, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Amigo and Dizz


Hello Djmarkgallo. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "The Amigo and Dizz".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:26, 15 December 2013 (UTC)