User talk:Djmaschek/Archive 2

File source problem with File:Louis Emmanuel Rey.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Louis Emmanuel Rey.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 06:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

French and Austrian generals, Battle of Wagram; Battle of Toulouse (1814)
Hello, thanks for your message and congratulations for your contributions. The two generals are now on my watchlist too, so I will help keep vandals and irrelevant content away. Austrian generals are a subject I'm interested in, although I will work on French ones exclusively. But it's good to know that someone competent is giving the Austrian generals the attention they deserve. Just to let you know, I am planning a massive extension of the Battle of Wagram, like the one I wrote on the Romanian wiki. It would be useful to have some more extensive articles on the following commanders: Prince Reuss-Plauen; Rosenberg-Orsini; Johan von Kollowrat; Archduke John; Prince Hohenzollern-Hechingen; Prince von Liechtenstein; general Radetzky; French émigré Armand von Nordmann; generals Grunne and Wimpffen and French general Roussel d'Hurbal who at the time was fighting for Austria. If you feel like contributing to creating/expanding any of these biographies, it would be great, as it would help achieve better coverage of the battle of Wagram in preparation of the expansion work that I'm planning.

Regarding the battle of Toulouse, I know that it's often the subject of debate. I've added the point of view of 3 mainstream French specialists who have written some standard work on the Napoleonic period. They believe that it was a French victory. We now have both points of view - that it was a Anglo-Allied or a French victory and we have both claims well sourced so debates should be over.Best,--Alexandru Demian (talk) 18:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Villagarcia
Thanks for the plaudit!Urselius (talk) 10:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Austrian generals
nice article on Keinmayer. :) I'm trying to put together a better list than the one that just lists the names.  Here: User:Auntieruth55/Habsburg Field Marshal List.  Would you take a look and see if I should do something different as I'm working on it?  (better now than later). Auntieruth55 (talk) 01:10, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the compliment. I notice it when you add articles to the list of Austrian Empire generals of the French Revolutionary Wars. Your Habsburg list would make an interesting article. Technically, your format looks okay. I wonder if it might look better to sort the Lt. Field Marshals, Feldzeugmeisters/Generals of Cavalry, and Field Marshals into their own separate tables, rather than mixing all three ranks together. Just a thought. Will the list include only the 1792-1815 period? Djmaschek (talk) 02:42, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, I'm thinking now only 1792-1815, but of course many of them fought before and I guess after that too. What do you think? The list allows for sorting, so I figured I could put them all together and then sort them out later, breaking them up that way. It could also be sorted by Regiment. 8th Hussars, etc.  Auntieruth55 (talk) 03:07, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


 * The table is a bit crowded. I wonder if a column could be eliminated, like putting Inhaber in Comments, for example. If it were me, I'd make separate lists for FMs, FZMs, and FMLs because each list could grow to encompass 1500-1918. When a table reaches a certain size, it becomes overwhelming. See Ban of Croatia for a long table. But, you're doing the work so it's your call! It's great that you write many well-researched articles about this interesting historical period. Djmaschek (talk) 05:26, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Auntieruth55, please see List of United States Senators for a really attractive table, including pictures. The trick is to make the rows a uniform size. If you used this table you could ignore my 25 March comments. Djmaschek (talk) 01:28, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * that is a neat table, but I think you overestimate my abilities with tables. I'll be happy for some help, though.  Which would be better, making separate tables for each rank, or making a single table that is color coded?  Auntieruth55 (talk) 01:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * My vote would be for separate tables for each rank. The list of FMs alone looks huge! Djmaschek (talk) 01:51, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * possibly just the Lieutenant field marshals. You could add Provera.  Auntieruth55 (talk) 01:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

take a look now. I'm thinking about omitting the campaigns, expanding the notes section. Or adding a column for "origin" since the Habsburgs tried to match up units with commanders of the similar ethnicity. Auntieruth55 (talk) 20:00, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You are still on the letter A. It's a big job that you've taken on. Good luck! Djmaschek (talk) 01:04, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * as you come across them, feel free to add them to the list. Also: Category:Austrian Lieutenant Field Marshals.  :)  Auntieruth55 (talk) 00:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Provera added. As you come across them, Dj, you might stick them in the list.  17:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thank you I dream of horses. Please let me know the article or articles that you liked so much. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 22:01, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm...I forgot, my fault, but it may have been Battle of Orbaitzeta.
 * Anyways, man, you deserved it! :-) --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @  23:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
— AustralianRupert (talk) 04:48, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Caldiero and Sacile
Hello. Yes, I had seen your edits of the article about Caldiero and I'm very happy that due to your contributions, the article is now more complete. It has always been my point of view that, so long as a contributor quotes solid sources, any point of view is acceptable. So, no problem as far as I am concerned, on the contrary. My only objection comes when contributors try to present minority opinions as being mainstream. Caldiero is obviously not the case, but there are battles (e.g. Borodino) that are now presented on wikipedia in ways that are, in my view, historically inaccurate. Regarding the French army ranks, I've always used the actual names (translated versions such as General of Division or sometimes French rank names in italics). This is because I privilege accuracy, even if it makes things more complicated for the occasional layman reader (does a layman really care...?). Conversely, if the reader knows a thing or two about Napoleonic military history, he will probably be surprised to see the Major General rank in the French army. Best,--Alexandru Demian (talk) 19:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Verona (1805)
I want to thank you for creating such a great new article, Battle of Verona (1805). I was browsing the new pages when I came across your article and I had to stop to appreciate your work. A lot of the new pages created are not fit for Wikipedia, and it's really nice to see one as admirable as yours among the lot. Thank you. --Odie5533 (talk) 05:23, 7 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Have assessed this as B. Good work. I think if you want to take it further a wider range of sources could help - just my opinion.Tttom1 (talk) 00:55, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

re Johann von Hiller
Thanks for improving this article with an infobox! Herostratus (talk) 13:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator?
The military history wikiproject will soon open the September 2010 coordinator elections to determine who among us will serve on the X Tranche, the coordinator tranche beginning 28 September of this month. The current coordinators have offered up the names of a limited number of editors who we believe would make good coordinators, and your name was included in the list. Therefore, I am leaving this message on behalf of the current milhist coordinators to encourage you to run for the position of coordinator. If you have any questions or comments about the position you are welcome to ask any members of the current coordinator tranche, we would be happy to answer your questions. Note that while this message is being left to encourage you to run for the position you are under no obligation to do so, and if you decide not to run this decision will not be held against you now or at any point in the future.

On belhalf of the Military history Coordinator IX Tranche, TomStar81 (Talk) 00:17, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: Battle of Piave and Napoleonic Wars
Thanks for pointing out the problem about the Piave River. I hadn't noticed the article about the WW1 battle because it had "the" in the title, so I thought there was no need to mention the year. Unfortunately, I can't move it to "Battle of the Piave River (1809)" because it already exists as a redirect to the current page and I'm not familiar with the procedure in such a case.

Regarding the Battle of Marengo, I've already proposed it for an A-class review and was working on creating stubs for the more important generals involved in the battle.

I'm glad that there are other users interested in such a domain and I'd really like to congratulate you on the articles you've expanded so far, especially as you've contributed with self-made maps as well. My other long-term goals are to bring Grande Armée to featured status, expand the Imperial and Royal Army during the Napoleonic Wars (I'm not really happy with the title as a non-specialist reader would have no idea it's actually about the Austrian army) and maybe create an article on Napoleonic warfare. If you'd like to work on the same subject in the future, just give me a message and I'll see how I can help. You can also speak to Alexandru.demian, who's a good friend of mine and has a wide range of research materials.

PS: A suggestion for your articles: I think you should move the larger OOB's to separate pages as they provide detailed information which for a simple reader would seem overwhelming and they also use up a lot space. Cheers, Andynomite (talk) 11:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Another thing: In Marengo Order of Battle you've mentioned Peter Morzin as commander of the grenadier division, but according to Kudrna he became FML only in 1830. I think you may have confused him with his brother, Ferdinand Morzin, who became FML in 1799 and is more likely to have participated at Marengo. Andynomite (talk) 11:13, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies  talk 21:32, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Castelnuovo
Thank your for your interest. I've added several citations to the paragraphs lacking of them at their ends. About the grammar, I'll wellcome your help. ElBufon (talk) 16:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of Graz
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Anton von Zach
The DYK project (nominate) 12:04, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Stanley Gordon Orr
Thanks for pointing out the errors on Stanley Gordon Orr. I have reworked some of the text of you would like to check. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 04:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Last stand
Please see Talk:Last stand -- PBS (talk) 09:50, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

License status of File:Johann Kolowrat.jpg
I'm working on cleaning up some files, and I came across File:Johann Kolowrat.jpg. You uploaded it, presumably from, and indicated that the copyright holder has released it into the public domain. I don't speak German, and don't even see that image at that location, so I am having trouble confirming that the copyright holder has released the file into PD. Can you help me?-- SPhilbrick  T  22:30, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for proving me with the link to the image here. That helps confirm the source.


 * My question relates to the licensing of the image. You added a license which states:


 * This work has been released into the public domain by the copyright holder. 


 * I'm looking for verification that this happened.


 * Based upon the dates of the image, I'm wondering if the wrong license was selected, and perhaps you meant to say that it is in the public domain because of its age, rather than in the public domain because the copyright holder released it.


 * I note your edit summary is:
 * Add public domain license.


 * Is it possible you determined that the print was old enough to qualify for PD, and selected "Template:PD-author" when "Template:PD-old" might have been a better choice?


 * The Commons license states, "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Jens-Florian Ebert. This applies worldwide."


 * My guess is that someone saw the license you selected, tracked down the author and added the more specific license to Commons. However, it seems highly unlikely that Jens-Florian Ebert actually did release it, unless that phrasing is a term of art meaning that it is "released" when it is old enough.


 * If you agree, would you be willing to change the license on the Wikipedia image from PD-Author to PD-Old, and I'll take care of making the change at Commons, then deleting the duplicate?


 * I'll separately follow up on File:Battle of the Bridge of Arcole.jpg-- SPhilbrick  T  11:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, now that I'm happy with the license in both places, I deleted the WP version. -- SPhilbrick  T  00:00, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Alfred Gibbs
I left this reply on my user page. People seem to differ about where they like to have replies so I repeat it here: "Thanks. I have written an expanded introduction and saved the page so it is online. Even after the first expanded draft, I think the article was short enough that the short introduction from the stub could still be used. I agree that with the longer article, a longer introduction is appropriate and in line with the guideline. I am trying to figure out the comment on the footnotes. I had a couple of citation needed templates put on an earlier article where I had citations for 80 to 90 per cent of the sentences and the others seemed to me to be related but they were tagged anyway. So I would like to be able to have the right form for including more than one sentence in a footnote and not have it tagged. On the other hand, since I have figured out how to make multiple references to the same footnote, I suppose that form does not waste as much space and is not a real bad alternative."Donner60 (talk) 08:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Gneisenau
Thanks for reviewing the article and fixing this - I've got scheer on the brain. Parsecboy (talk) 04:59, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

General Sahuc
Hello, congratulations for the beautiful article on General Sahuc. I think you will be happy to see. Best, --Alexandru Demian (talk) 13:26, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It would be great to see these articles expanded. I'm also curious to read the stuff you can add on Sahuc; I'll have a look myself to see if I can add something from my own sources. By the way, here's a fresh biography I've just finished. I thought it was a pity we didn't have anything at all on this general, since he was probably the most significant artilleryman of the Napoleonic Wars, but doesn't seem to have captured the imagination of his contemporaries to the same extent as Drouot, Lariboisiere or Senarmont. Otherwise, I'm currently working on biographies of generals who fought at Wagram, in preparation of a significant expansion of the article. Also working on this. Best,--Alexandru Demian (talk) 22:44, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Vukassovich
You are welcome! BTW, you wrote a very nice article, and if you need any help in improving it further, I will be happy to assist. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 18:44, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Djmaschek! Well, I added some minor things into the article, and was wondering if you are interested in bringing this article to GA status? --Kebeta (talk) 19:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:33, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Nansouty
Hello! I've just finished work on this article. I can't actually believe that I've finished, it took me weeks of hard work. Anyway, I just wanted to see if you could have a look at it for proofreading, when you have time. I'm guessing that, since I've done some major translations from French, there would be phrases which are either unclear or should be improved. Best,--Alexandru Demian (talk) 21:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for your comments and work on the article, I didn't think you would respond so fast! Great! I've done some minor editing too just now. I do want to have it up for B-class revision, just wanted to have some expert advice on content and form beforehand. The relatively easy thing with the images here is that Nansouty (and d'Hautpoul for that matter) commanded cuirassiers for much of his career. And cuirassiers seem to have captured the imagination of great many painters of the time, which is why I could find some pretty stunning pictures for the article. --Alexandru Demian (talk) 09:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Lübeck
Hi, I've added some info to your article Battle of Lübeck. Above all, I found French losses: 1,500 men overall, killed and wounded. I've also added other elements. Do feel free to move it around as you like, if you think it does not suit well stylistically. Great work! Best,--Alexandru Demian (talk) 00:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Nansouty A-class nomination
Hi Djmaschek, I've put up the article about General Nansouty for A-Class Review here. Your review would be much appreciated. Best,--Alexandru Demian (talk) 23:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

River in Poland
I think you misread it. The name of the river is Wkra not Wrka.-- Obsidi ♠ n Soul  05:06, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

ACR Request
Hi there, I notice you're signed up to the WikiProject Military history/Napoleonic era task force in MILHIST, and wondered if you would be interested in conducting an A-class review for Battle record of Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington, based on your "speciality" areas, i.e. battles; I require one more Support review before it will be applicable to raise it from B to A-class quality. Thanks, Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh '''  (talk) 05:44, 6 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your reply. I understand your concerns - ACR is similar to BCR only tighter on requirements like citations, content, MOS, etc, but not as strict as a FAC reviews appear to be. I understand if you want to attain a certain quality through your own articles before attempting to preach higher standards, though - good luck getting one done soon. I am also worried this too will "time out", despite the work that has gone into it, there is a lack of reviewers at the moment - perhaps only 2 or 3 active, where 5 to 10 would be better suited for a WikiProject this big. Regards, Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh '''  (talk) 03:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Durutte
Hi Djmaschek, sorry for being so slow in replying. I'm actually on holiday and with limited access to the internet. The phrase is indeed surprising, as Napoleon is actually saying: "I have never done any good (bestowed any favours) to that man; Metz is still ours." He is probably referring to his perception of 1813-1814 that the generals who had received the most significant promotions and titles were the ones who were least motivated to keep on fighting. Conversely, since Napoleon had not bestowed any favours to Durutte, the latter would do everything in his power to defend the city and thus prove his talents. I'll look into what photos I can find of the respective generals in a short while. Best, --Alexandru Demian (talk) 09:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Smith-Kudrna
I am cleaning up François Sebastien Charles Joseph de Croix, Count of Clerfayt (mainly adding inline citation for EB1911). I came across an in-line citation in the text that says:
 * Smith-Kudrna, Clerfayt de Croix

That you added on 20 Feb 2010 I had a look around the net and the only mention I can find for "Smith-Kudrna" is Wikipedia articles or their mirrors. One of the other articles was Paul Davidovich which I see you added in the Smith-Kudrna citation on 7 March 2010. Please could you provide more details on the Count of Clerfayt page (date, publisher isbn, or if on line a url) so that the citation can be easily verified? -- PBS (talk) 01:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the very prompt edit. I had just worked it out for myself (because your fuller reference was already sitting in the external links section) My confusion was that I had assumed that "Smith-Kudrna" must have been a double barrelled name. While changing it I had an edit clash with your, but I have kept my changes which use snf and cite book to tie the short citation in the text into the References section. For you convenience here is the cite book template as I filled it out on the page:
 * It produces
 * It produces

--PBS (talk) 02:44, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with every word you wrote in your last posting to my talk page. I only started to use the citation templates earlier this year. FYI if you use the templates sfn harv and harvnb ("nb" stands for no brackets). You have to add the parameter ref=harv to cite book etc for them to work, but not to the citation template as it has that parameter set by default. sfn is a particularly useful template because it automagically puts in, which means that you do not have to worry about how many tims the same page is cited and if at a later date if the first citation is removed it will not break the rest of them (making page construction and maintenance easier). -- PBS (talk) 04:31, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

WikiChevrons
Hi! I've just discovered this award on my talk page. Thanks a lot, Djmaschek! It's nice to have one's work recognised this way. Best,--Alexandru Demian (talk) 09:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

James Inglis Hamilton
Hey Djmaschek, I noticed you edited the James Inglis Hamilton article, and I thank you for that. It was quite helpful. I do have one (it may be stupid) question though. Which source lists his birth date as "before 1742"? —Michael Jester (talk) 05:03, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I appreciate the advice about the article. For some reason this guy is really interesting to me. I am trying to expand the article with your comments. I will add that his son was killed while commanded the Scot Greys. —Michael Jester (talk) 05:40, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, I have expanding the article by adding some background information about the battles. I was wondering if you could check it out and see if I'm going along the correct path, or if I'm just messing up the article. Thanks! —Michael Jester (talk) 01:32, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Simeon Thayer
Hey, I've fixed up the assessment on Simeon Thayer. All good: B class. Vought109 (talk) 03:29, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Template:Campaignbox American Revolutionary War: Philadelphia
Hi. Please see This is mostly how that campaignbox should be done, plus the refinement of liststyle = hlist, as described in that discussion. Whatever widening you're referring to is most likely due to your not having the current version of things like MediaWiki:common.css in your browser cache. Please purge things, and look again. Alarbus (talk) 02:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Template talk:Navbox


 * Flatfile
 * Thanks for the note about the American Revolutionary War: Philadelphia campaignbox. When I saw pages messed up on my home computer I assumed it was caused by the last edit. I failed to recall that they looked OK on my work computer. It's late and I'll look into your suggestions tomorrow. Djmaschek (talk) 05:14, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks; best to keep this thread together.
 * This stuff works fine. I'm going through templates I've been working on, moving to the better technique; when I get to this one, I'm do it, too. Please adopt this for campaignboxes, military navigation, and all other forms of navboxes you work on.
 * Alarbus (talk) 05:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I've had a chance to look into the new flatlist and I confess that I don't know how to fix the problem despite the instructions. My campaignbox opens as a single row. In one case it causes the infobox to be shifted to the right of the rest of the text. How do I get the correct version in my browser cache? I tried a suggestion by user Dianaa to add wikipedia.org to the Compatibility View Settings and that didn't fix the problem. I could live with this except the article in question opens with the campaignbox in "show" mode. How can I force the page to open with the campaignbox in "hide" mode? Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 04:28, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


 * You need to not use IE's compatibility mode. It's all about telling it to do things old-school. It's really "backwards-compatibility" mode and entails hauling all the code for older browsers along into later versions. They use a 'broken-page' icon for a reason. Clearing cache is in your preferences, somewhere; clearing wiki-server cache is w/action=purge; there's an option in preferences→gadgets to add this to your wiki-tools. To set a particular campaign box to wake up collapsed, you would add | state = collapsed. I'll do the one I think you're talking about. ✅ Alarbus (talk) 04:35, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * state = allow overrides from specific pages. Alarbus (talk) 05:36, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You may have misunderstood, Djmascdhek. If the website is on the list, you will be viewing it in compatibility mode as the default. Remove it from the list. --Dianna (talk) 05:27, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Re: Radzymin
Please note that the principal author of this is User:Halibutt, you may want to copy that message from my talk page to his. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 05:39, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Battle of Hohenlinden March of Richpanse.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Battle of Hohenlinden March of Richpanse.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I added the following. Please remove the warning. Thanks. Permission    = The website http://www.antique-prints.de/shop/catalog.php?cat=KAT28&lang=ENG&product=P008518&sid8C7206B11AE9452E813C63DC513C7BDE=0f47d8b2637037b803b9283372a5d46d notes that the original engraving was created by Raffet and Beyer in 1845. This artwork is therefore within public domain. Djmaschek (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up Magog the Ogre. I also removed the tag. Djmaschek (talk) 04:10, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Eleazer Oswald
Djmaschek, very good job on E Oswald...well assembled and noted. A mention of his father lost at sea does not seem important to the history-line, that I can see. The depth of history is quite interesting, expecially the battles. Suggest having subsection breaks in both of the two main sections. Also, suggest replacing some of the book references with some of your on-line references so readers or future reviewer can access on-lines sources for you information. I rated the article B, as you have done very well in creating this article. Thank you for your valuable time and effort in our American history. Cheers, Lance...LanceBarber (talk) 18:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Jeremiah Olney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Cadwalader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Lewis Nicola
Hello Djmaschek. A few days ago you assessed Lewis Nicola and commented saying there were problems with the auto translations. I believe I have fixed (most) of the problems and was wondering if you could reassess the article. I plan on sending it to a peer review, hoping it can become a good article. Thanks is advanced and have a great New Year! —Michael Jester (talk &#183; contribs) 06:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

—Michael Jester (talk &#183; contribs) 08:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * My apologies, sir. I will look over the article again and fix errors I see. I got a little too caught up in the article and was over looking mistakes.

DYK for Battle of Bull's Ferry
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Re:Apology
That's ok. Apology accepted. Wild Wolf (talk) 04:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Patton's Additional Continental Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sir Henry Clinton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Richard Parker (colonel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Scott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Grayson's Additional Continental Regiment & 8th Virginia Regiment
DJ, I'm enjoying your new articles. Did a B rating on both, failed; History sections a tad long, please add subsections to both. Thank you much. Cheers, Lance. LanceBarber (talk) 09:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * B-rated. You do excellant work! Cheers, Lance. LanceBarber (talk) 06:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

New Nathaniel Gist article

 * Per your query on my talk page about section order, check out WP:ORDER. Also, for the top of articles, there's WP:LEAD. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Nathaniel Gist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cherokee War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Charles Mynn Thruston (disambiguation)
DJ, I found two Charles as I was trying to link the grandson to the Thurstons Add. Cont. Reg.: As I was creating the disambig page to track the two Charles, User:Alan Liefting jumped in and wanted to delete the disambig page. As you are an Amer Rev expert, maybe you could follow up on the grandfather article. I am starting a new job tomorrow and with an hours drive to and from work, I'll have limited time on creating any new detailed wiki articles. Hope you can help, Thanks, Lance....LanceBarber (talk) 05:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Charles Mynn Thruston, (February 22, 1798 – February 18, 1873) was a soldier, farmer, politician, and a brigadier general in the Union Army
 * Charles Mynn Thruston, 1738~1812, Continental officer (Col.) during American Revolution, clergyman, judge, statesman. see http://arlisherring.com/tng/getperson.php?personID=I096848&tree=Herring Grandfather to Thruston 1798-1873, see Thruston's Additional Continental Regiment‎
 * You did good! new disambig and new colonel page! Yesssssssssssssss, thank you, Lance..LanceBarber (talk) 05:06, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7
Hi. When you recently edited Thomas Proctor (general), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bombardiers and Gunner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. When you recently edited Battle of Eutaw Springs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Baptista Ashe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Assessment for Book:Arkansas Confederate Units
I wonder if I could get you to make assessments of the following articles to see if they meet the "Class B" Criteria. These articles are included in the Book:Arkansas Confederate Units. I would appreciate any feed back that you could offer. Aleutian06 (talk) 13:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 16th Arkansas Infantry Regiment
 * 17th Arkansas Infantry Regiment (Griffith's)
 * 17th Arkansas Infantry Regiment (Lemoyne's)
 * 18th Arkansas Infantry Regiment (Carroll's)
 * 18th Arkansas Infantry Regiment (Marmaduke's)
 * 19th Arkansas Infantry Regiment (Dawson's)
 * 19th Arkansas Infantry Regiment (Dockery's)
 * 19th Arkansas Infantry Regiment (Hardy's)
 * 21st Arkansas Infantry Regiment (Craven's)
 * 23rd Arkansas Infantry Regiment
 * 25th Arkansas Infantry Regiment
 * 27th Arkansas Infantry Regiment
 * 28th Arkansas Infantry Regiment
 * 29th Arkansas Infantry Regiment
 * 30th Arkansas Infantry Regiment
 * 31st Arkansas Infantry Regiment

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. When you recently edited Battle of Voltri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Siege of Fort Mifflin article
As the primary editor of this article, I thought that you'd be interested that I've written an article on HMS Vigilant (1777), the ship primarily responsible for the British victory. Some of the information in your article is incorrect and should be updated with the information from the ship's article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:59, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:49, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Your note
Hi Djmaschek! Apologies for taking 2 full months to respond to your note from May; it's just been a hectic period for me and I thus found little time for wikipedia. Great work on these articles; I myself have left a few articles unfinished, including the one on Lagrange, another on the title Marshal of the Empire and I still feel that the one about the grenadiers à cheval is not yet up the standard that would satisfy me.. But, in any case, I guess I have to prioritise and I'd really like to finish my massive article about the battle of Wagram and get it out of my sandbox once and for all, as it took a lot of time and energy to write and it would just be a pitty if no one could actually read it. There is also a peer review request put up for the battle of Corunna and I always feel that I need to contribute when such requests are made. But then again, so little time, so much to do.. Anyways. Hope all is well and I really enjoy reading your artIcles! Great work, neutral, well sourced and excellent narrative. Thanks for that. Best, --Alexandru Demian (talk) 07:19, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

USCGC Point Franklin (WPB-82350)
Thank you for your suggestions for edits on this article. I will try to rewrite them as you suggest, however as a former Coast Guardsman, I know that there are legal differences between "distressed" and "damaged". I would be willing to bet that the entries in the Coast Guard Historians records are taken verbatim from the cutter's logbooks. The Coast Guard, for far too many years suffered from a lack of funds and operations were far more important than someone taking history notes, so the Coast Guard Historian's Office ran on a shoestring budget. It still does to a certain extent. One can tell little attention was paid to history when several years of cutter history don't even exist in published form. Using Point Franklin as an example, there is no published cutter history from 1886 to 1998 when it was decommissioned. The history happened; the cutter was in one of three operational phases, Alpha, Bravo or Charlie. Alpha being on active patrol, Bravo; in port, for crew rest and provisioning but still on call. Charlie is yard or maintenance availabilities that would preclude being on recall. My personal experience is that Charlie takes about ten percent of a cutters available time, give or take. The rest of the time would have been spent on law enforcement duties or search and rescue. They were busy, but the Historians Office has neither the time or the manpower to update the published record of the cutter. It is a crying shame, but the Point Class of cutters is not a big priority for the Historian's Office. They are to busy trying to keep up with recording and dissemination of current affairs on a limited budget. There are, to my knowledge, no other reliable published resources for the histories of this class of cutter. The part of the class that served in Vietnam are covered in several ways that have very reliable sources of information and articles on them were very easy to write without sounding mechanical about it. It is my wish to complete this class of cutters with articles in Wikipedia, but the Historians Office published accounts of their histories are in some cases are just a few sentences. That hardly gives credit to the crews of this class of cutters that risked their lives in many instances during rescues and during law enforcement evolutions. As someone who has been there, it is a sad state of affairs but there is nothing I can do about it. Some of the articles may be nothing more than stubs, but they should really be done to complete the class. Thank you for your suggestions, I will used them along with the limited amount of material at hand and keep plugging away. Cheers. Cuprum17 (talk) 16:44, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It occurred to me that you might be from the Coast Guard. The Coast Guard historian writes a very terse and dry history which is not much to go on. I was at Cape May for the first time last October so I guessed wrong about the Cape May Light being the same as the Delaware Light Station. I rated your article B-class. Ordinarily I like to see a 4 to 5 sentence lead paragraph for B-class. Good luck on completing the Point class. Djmaschek (talk) 04:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your patience and guidance. I will try to come up with more of a lede but you have seen the material I have to work with. I shall try to finish the series of articles with your suggestions in mind. When you were in Cape Maydid you get to tour any Coast Guard facilities?. Cuprum17 (talk) 13:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * My wife and I just did tourist things in town but did get to the beach (or shore as they say in NJ). The view across Delaware Bay from Cape May is stunning. Djmaschek (talk) 02:33, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Battle of sacile map on common
Hello, I am a french user of wikipedia, mostly on french wiki but also on several others including english. I would like to use the map you designed for battle of Sacile, (where one of my ancestors was heavily wounded in 1809), in french and italian wiki minimum. Why not using international commons instead of only english wikimedia ? Obviously i could do a copy myself, but i think, it is only fair that you keep your name on your beautiful maps, when they will be used every where in-Ze-World. Take care. --AchilleT (talk) 15:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Tarvis (1797), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyrol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Tarvis (1797), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Klausen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Pla (1811), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montblanc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:47, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Castalla (1812), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Wellesley, Duke of Wellington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Not yet in all-Ze-World, but already in french, italian and german wiki, as well as english. --AchilleT (talk) 17:05, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis Jean Nicolas Abbé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Caldiero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Farm to Market Roads in Texas
Hey, Djmaschek. Thank you for creating pages on a few Farm to Market Roads in Texas. I've noticed you've been assessing them as stubs for WP:USRD. Just wanted to let you know that if you create an article that has the route description, history, and major intersections sections, it's a C-Class for USRD. Thanks. – TC N7  JM  12:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:09, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacques Thomas Sarrut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vitoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of San Millan-Osma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:39, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis Partouneaux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Battle of Sandwich...
Just came across the work you did on Battle of Sandwich (1217) back in 2011 - nice work! Hchc2009 (talk) 09:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:35, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Hahn, Texas
Hey there. I have taken a good look at the Hahn Tx article. It looks to be a great start. However, I am having a tyad bit f trouble with the way maps are used. I think I have written over 2000 articles on snal places in the US and I think Hahn could be a great article if it was possible to relate why the places in Hahn are mentioned. (A famous battle, a famous family etc etc etc) Otherwise, the issue of notability comes along. Let me know how I can helpCoal town guy (talk) 20:32, 30 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Djmaschek, whoah whoah. I am on your side and have fun as well. The only contention I would have is the levelk of detail. I am painfully aware of amller places and remote loications on the map and I am 100% with you. The only specific questions I would have are do you think its needed to include data about which quad this place is located in? AND do you think its needed to tell folks which road and if its a right or left. I think, its fantastic to have the level of detail especially for smaloler places. We all evolve and I certainly hope to do so as well. The reason I would even ask this is given the level of detail, do you think it would help or hinder? For example, the quad data could go in a geography section, and stating the geo coordibates in the article itself, is over kill, you have an info box and a title abopve the map image, how many more do you need? Again, this is a great article, love the cemetery data, however, on a lark as it were, is the cemetery populated by a famous family or persons? How many are a few oil wells? How about a section on what the oil industry meant to that place? Just some thoughts and by no means were my words meant as a challenge and most of all, to deter fun, it is fun. My apologies if in any wway I was perceived as challenging youCoal town guy (talk) 13:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:08, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francisco Javier Venegas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Ucles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Arzobispo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Talavera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Uclés (1809), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Madridejos and Ocaña (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:10, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Uclés (1809), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toledo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Pacthod and Puthod
Hey Djmaschek. Nice to hear from you. I know that at least one notable person (Comte d'Artois) got them confused and censored one for joining Napoleon, while it was the other who had done that. Quite funny actually. Great work, anyway. Cheers, Alexandru. --Alexandru Demian (talk) 15:52, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=568029143 your edit] to Matthews, Texas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Road 950|FM 950]]. The settlement was named for a man who owned an area plantation before the American Civil War. By 2013, the school, post office, businesses and railroad line that once

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Houston WikiProject
Do you participate in the Houston WikiProject? WhisperToMe (talk) 06:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited III Cavalry Corps (Grande Armée), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of the Berezina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 16:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:26, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Corps (Grande Armée), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Alcantara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siege of Mequinenza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tudela (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:12, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Texas county highway navboxes
All of them have been nominated for deletion, including Falls County, Texas Highways, which you created. Please feel free to participate in the discussion at Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 26.  Imzadi 1979  →   23:21, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Second Siege of Badajoz (1811), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=585979358 your edit] to Battle of Albuera may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:58, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * slowly but surely and finally began the Second Siege of Badajoz (1811)|Second Siege of Badajoz on 4 May.

The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Prince Friedrich of Hohenzollern.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Prince Friedrich of Hohenzollern.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enrique José O'Donnell, Conde de La Bisbal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Sebastian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vinko Knežević, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Cassano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Jean René Moreaux
Hi, if you have finished expanding this, would you mind my nominating this for Did you know, which would hopefully result in its appearing on the main page? Thanks, Mat  ty. 007 19:24, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * There is one small issue at the nomination which I am not sure about, would it be possible for you to clarify it please? Thanks, Mat  ty  .  007  18:28, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Battle of Erquelinnes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Battle of Fleurus


 * Battle of Gosselies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Battle of Fleurus


 * Battle of Grandreng (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Battle of Fleurus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:53, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:18, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:08, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Novi (1799), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army of Italy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siege of Le Quesnoy (1793), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Valenciennes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Battle of Aldenhoven (1793)
 * added a link pointing to Namur


 * Battle of Kaiserslautern (1794)
 * added a link pointing to Battle of Fleurus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 9 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Battle of Kaiserslautern page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=624758549 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F624758549%7CBattle of Kaiserslautern%5D%5D Ask for help])

The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Waterloo Bicentennial
Hi, we've started a  Waterloo bicentennial project to bring related articles up to scratch and hope to get some featured at the time of the event(s). Let me know if you're interested! I hope so! auntieruth (talk) 16:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

new msg
another re Battle of Schliengen

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou! The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

map for article on 1796 Rhine campaign
Fantastic! I should do something like that for the Danube campaign of 1800. If I can figure out the template! :) auntieruth (talk) 18:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)


 * auntieruth: Thanks. See Barrier Treaty article which was the first time I used it. Copy it to your sandbox and play around with it there. I don't know how to use it for areas smaller than nations. Nor do I know how to incorporate it into a military conflict infobox. Djmaschek (talk) 01:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Neerwinden (1793)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Neerwinden (1793) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MisterBee1966 -- MisterBee1966 (talk) 12:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Siege of Hüningen and archive?
Siege of Hüningen is at A-class review. Would you have a look? Also, have you tried archiving your talk page? It makes my computer crash! ;) This is the command:

take out the nowiki commands, of course. And add your name as User talk..... auntieruth (talk) 21:14, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Auntieruth55, I am not in a position to do any major work for a few days. Thanks for the archiving info. Djmaschek (talk) 18:40, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Neerwinden (1793)
The article Battle of Neerwinden (1793) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Neerwinden (1793) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MisterBee1966 -- MisterBee1966 (talk) 12:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Battle of Molins de Rey
You are by far the largest contributor to the article Battle of Molins de Rey -- thank you for writing it. When you have time please could you add in-line citations to the article. -- PBS (talk) 10:51, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators,

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Ettlingen
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Ettlingen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 20:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=639876679 your edit] to Battle of Stockach (1800) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:31, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Antoine Champion de Nansouty]]. Vandamme commanded 9,632 infantry and 540 cavalry, Montrichard supervised 6,998 infantry, Lorge had 8,238 infantry and 464 cavalry and Nansouty directed 1,500 [[

Your GA nomination of Battle of Ettlingen
The article Battle of Ettlingen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Ettlingen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. auntieruth (talk) 20:48, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jean Étienne Championnet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Fleurus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 6 February 2015 (UTC)