User talk:Djmatrundola

File copyright problem with File:Newyorkfilmfestival.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Newyorkfilmfestival.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 02:38, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Dilutethepoisonposter.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Dilutethepoisonposter.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 02:39, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at D.J. Matrundola. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 18:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Shortfilmbarscene.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shortfilmbarscene.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Steamroller Assault (talk) 18:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

This Photo was taken on the set of the Short Film "One Love". Running Hooks Pictureshas give permission to publish this picture on Wikipedia. It can be used by anyone but cannot be modified. Djmatrundola (talk) 17:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Shortfilmhospitalscene.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shortfilmhospitalscene.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Steamroller Assault (talk) 18:25, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

This Photo was taken on the set of the Short Film "One Love". Running Hooks Pictureshas give permission to publish this picture on Wikipedia. It can be used by anyone but cannot be modified. Djmatrundola (talk) 17:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Shortfilmbenzscene.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shortfilmbenzscene.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Steamroller Assault (talk) 18:25, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

This Photo was taken on the set of the Short Film "One Love". Running Hooks Pictureshas give permission to publish this picture on Wikipedia. It can be used by anyone but cannot be modified. Djmatrundola (talk) 17:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Staff josh.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Staff josh.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 18:28, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of D.J. Matrundola


A tag has been placed on D.J. Matrundola, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of D.J. Matrundola and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Rrburke (talk) 18:29, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dilute the Poison (Music Video)
A tag has been placed on Dilute the Poison (Music Video) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop using Wikipedia to promote your own works. Continuing to do so will get you blocked. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I will not use Wikipedia to promote myself. I was unaware I was falling into that category. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djmatrundola (talk • contribs)


 * Your contributions to Wikipedia on topics about which you are knowledgeable but to which you have no personal connection are very welcome. However, in general Wikipedia strongly discourages editors from writing autobiographies or contributing to articles about themselves, their associates or competitors, or any businesses or projects in which either is involved.  If you'd like to know more about the rationale for these restrictions, please consider having a look at  Conflict of interest and Neutral point of view.  -- Rrburke (talk) 21:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, I will use this info and follow the guidelines of Wikipedia. :)Djmatrundola (talk) 00:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Three Steps Back To Nothing (Film)


The article Three Steps Back To Nothing (Film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable film. Only claims to notability are from dubious film festival selections.  Article created by film's director.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I will not use Wikipedia to promote myself. I was unaware I was falling into that category.Djmatrundola (talk) 00:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Zymosis (Film)
I have nominated Zymosis (Film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Zymosis (Film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Three Steps Back To Nothing (Film). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:09, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Three Steps Back To Nothing (Film). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tommy (msg) 20:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I will no longer delete (vandalize) my own pages. I just wanted to get them off Wikipedia as soon as I could. I realized that I was not adhering to the rules only after he pages were up. I will follow the rules set out by Wikipedia.
 * If you wish to delete an article which you created and to which you are the sole significant contributor, you can add the tag   to the top of the page and it will be deleted in due course.


 * On another matter, when submitting talk page comments, please add four tildes (like this:  ~ ) at the end of your comment. This will sign and datestamp your message so others will know who wrote the comment and when it was added.


 * If you need any help, please let me know. As an alternative, you can add the tag    at the top of this page and someone will come along to answer your question. -- Rrburke (talk) 22:51, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your help Rrburke Djmatrundola (talk) 00:45, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Djmatrundolaproductionpic2.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Djmatrundolaproductionpic2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 04:44, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Djmatrundoladirectorpic1j.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Djmatrundoladirectorpic1j.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 04:44, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Estrangedproductionpic1.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Estrangedproductionpic1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 04:45, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyrighted works
Please take a look at WP:Donating copyrighted materials. As you will see, images posted to Wikipedia need to me compliant with the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). This partially means that you allow derivative works to be made, which is contrary to your stated intent. In addition, there is no way to verify that permission has been given unless certain steps are taken. Steamroller Assault (talk) 21:28, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Threestepsbacktonothing.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Threestepsbacktonothing.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:52, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Runninghooks logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Runninghooks logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Conversionproductionpic2.png
Thank you for uploading File:Conversionproductionpic2.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Conversionproductionpic1.png
Thanks for uploading File:Conversionproductionpic1.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Estrangedmoviepic2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Estrangedmoviepic2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:55, 16 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:55, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Estrangedmoviepic1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Estrangedmoviepic1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:55, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Zymosisproductionpic2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Zymosisproductionpic2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Zymosisproductionpic1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Zymosisproductionpic1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Zymosisposter.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Zymosisposter.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Conversionproductionpic2.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Conversionproductionpic2.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Conversionproductionpic1.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Conversionproductionpic1.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:16, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Estrangedmoviepic1.jpg needs authorship information.
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Estrangedmoviepic1.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).


 * If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the own template..


 * If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:19, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Conversionproductionpic1.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Conversionproductionpic1.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:59, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Conversionproductionpic2.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Conversionproductionpic2.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:59, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Shortfilmbirthscene.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shortfilmbirthscene.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:00, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Zymosisproductionpic1.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zymosisproductionpic1.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:01, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Zymosisproductionpic3.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zymosisproductionpic3.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:01, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Zymosisproductionpic2.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zymosisproductionpic2.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:01, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Dilutethepoisonpic1.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dilutethepoisonpic1.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:02, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Dilutethepoisonpic2.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dilutethepoisonpic2.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:03, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Dilutethepoisonpic3.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dilutethepoisonpic3.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:03, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Dilutethepoisonpic4.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dilutethepoisonpic4.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:03, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Estrangedmoviepic2.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Estrangedmoviepic2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:07, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Estrangedmoviepic1.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Estrangedmoviepic1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:07, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of One Love (2009 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One Love (2009 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/One Love (2009 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:07, 19 August 2020 (UTC)