User talk:Djmoq3/sandbox

Emma's Peer Review
Seems like you're off to a great start! I found your topic to be very interesting, and I like how you included specific examples from our class lectures with Dr. Wilson. Your lead section provides good definitions as to what exactly winner and loser effects are, and they seem to be cited well. The references that you have selected all seem to be valid sources of information. I did notice a few grammar/spelling errors in the draft, but it seems like you are still working on completing the draft. ("Essentially if an animal perceives that it has high resource holding potetntial..." where potential is spelled incorrectly). It may be helpful to review the sentencing style you are using within the article. There seems to be a few run on sentences that could be broken down into an easier to comprehend format. Another suggestion I have is that it may be helpful to include some photos in your article. I personally am not familiar with the species Rivals marmoratus, as mentioned in the lead section. It would be convenient to have a visual element to go along with the examples you reference. Overall, you seem to have plenty of good ideas for your article that are well thought out. Looking forward to reading your finished product! Emmaantle (talk) 00:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Donovan's Response to Peer Review
Thanks Emma, glad that you think my article is interesting and the lead paragraph gives a good overview of the topic. Also, thank you for pointing out issues with grammar/spelling, and run on sentences. These mistakes that I have in the article, will be reviewed in depth as I refine and add to the article as I struggle with grammar and such. I also plan on adding images and such to the article once I get all my main ideas down, and topics covered. I agree that this would be very helpful as it allows the reader to have a mental image or a general idea of what I'm talking about, or at the least help them imagine how the process works in that specific animal species. Overall, thanks for the review! If you happen to be on the page and notice any other mistakes please give me a heads up in this talk section.

Thanks, Djmoq3 (talk) 11:42, 30 October 2017 (UTC)