User talk:Djobes/sandbox

Nomenclature
It seems like quantum dense coding, superdense coding, and dense coding are all used interchangeably. I think the first sentence should include them all to clarify that. Add an aka. (Donaldfee (talk) 03:08, 8 December 2018 (UTC))

current experimental applications of superdense coding
This page is lacking experimental results even though the field is very active. For example:

this was the first experimental demonstration of superdense coding, where they achieved 1.58 bits per qubit (not a perfect 2): https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4656 (they used polarization of photons).

This year researchers exceeded the two-bit limit using high dimensional entanglement. http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/7/eaat9304

This group was the first transmit superdense coding over optical fiber. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.050501Donaldfee (talk) 03:10, 8 December 2018 (UTC)