User talk:Djward21/Psychological resilience/Skycbradford Peer Review

Peer review response :)
Thank you so much for your detailed and constructive review! I'm thrilled that you appreciated the addition of the overview section, and I completely agree with your suggestion to include additional citations to enhance its credibility. I will make sure to address that in the next iteration. Regarding the Lead portion, the bolded and italicized words were indeed my additions, and I have not found any research within Wikipedia's criteria for a source and may have to approach the article with a different information source. I'm glad to hear that the tone of the draft aligns with Wikipedia's standards and is deemed acceptable. I also appreciate your advice regarding the sources, and I will strive to incorporate more recent publications while ensuring a balanced mix. As for the sections I'm still working on, I will take your suggestions into consideration and aim to include more citations in the Process section for added credibility. Additionally, I will delve deeper into the four main factors in the Mixed model section to provide a more comprehensive understanding. Your feedback has been immensely helpful, and I'm grateful for your support and encouragement. I'm excited to implement your suggestions and further develop the article. Thank you once again for your valuable input! Djward21 (talk) 23:06, 25 June 2023 (UTC)