User talk:Djzailes101

Removing reliably sourced material
Hello. I'm glad to see you've come to edit Wikipedia.

The most recent edit you made to Roger Ailes had a few problems:
 * Sources: sources are very important to Wikipedia, because we need our readers to be able to verify everything. Your edit removed a sourced paragraph and added an unsourced one.
 * Personal opinion: while the edit you removed may have been a disguised opinion, your own edit was also a personal opinion. Fighting fire with fire just makes more fire! It is better to leave all personal opinions out.
 * Removing controversial content - this actually isn't a problem, but I wanted to explain that in such circumstances, it's usually best to open a discussion about it. For example, leaving an opinion at Talk:Roger Ailes. I've also opened a thread on one of Wikipedia's noticeboards about what I think is problematic content: WP:BLPN that you may feel free to contribute to.

As such, I have undone your edit. Please understand that being reverted might, at first blush, seem unfair or frustrating. This is actually quite common. But it is part of the process, and I'd be glad to talk you through any of it, and maybe help the article be a bit more fair.

Please let me know if you have any questions by responding here with this template:  or leaving a message on my talk page.

Cheers. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:01, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Roger Ailes. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.  NQ    talk  06:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Roger Ailes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  NQ    talk  14:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  NQ    talk  14:17, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Roger Ailes.  Jay  Jay What did I do? 17:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Kralizec! (talk) 19:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Djzailes101/sandbox (November 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Djzailes101/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Djzailes101 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rankersbo&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Djzailes101 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 21:22, 14 November 2014 (UTC)