User talk:Dkspartan1835

undid my revision
Hi, Sorry about undoing your edit without deliberation. I corrected myself. --Golta (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Golta

November 2017
Your recent editing history at Book of Joshua shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 15:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Please remove the unsourced material you added
I hope that you want to abide by our policies. As I said in my edit summary, this text "Inlater years of the 20th century, academic analysis tended to be increasingly skeptical of the historicity of the early Israelite military campaigns as described in Joshua. To be sure, scholarship remained somewhat divided with some more deferential to the Biblical account. " is sourced to our article.

This text: "Whether through pastoral migration or military conquest, the Israelite settlement cannot easily be pegged to a specific time period. Scholars have argued in favor of the 14th, 13th, and 12th centuries BCE.", added twice today, has a fact tag dated August 2017. WP:VERIFY is very clear: "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source."

Reverting it would be what we call a self-revert and cancel out your 3rd revert today. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 15:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Ah, too late. Doug Weller  talk 15:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Incorrect revisions
Why are you reverting factually-correct information regarding the Little Caesars Arena capacity? The capacity is not exactly 20,000. That is only an estimation. Every home game has been an announced sell out of 19,515. You don't really think that the Red Wings have fallen exactly 485 short for every single home game this season, do you? Please don't overwrite hard evidence with estimations! (saint0wen (talk) 08:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC))

September 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tucker Carlson, you may be blocked from editing. ''Your edit summary was nonsensical. '' Toddst1 (talk) 03:53, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Can we please move to block Dkspartan1835 - because his or her edits clearly partisan and not factual - and reinsert the following paragraph:

In January 2018, American comedian Chelsea Handler suggested that Graham was being blackmailed by the Trump administration because, she said, he is gay and remains in the closet. Graham dismissed the rumors in a statement to the New York Times.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.208.214.146 (talk) 10:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Aaron Hernandez
You removed a citation needed tag from the Aaron Hernandez article, saying that the citation at the end covered the entire paragraph. There are two citations in this paragraph, and it is not immediately apparent which source supports this statement. I restored the tag. Would you please replace it with the correct citation? Thanks! --Slugger O&#39;Toole (talk) 16:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Removing reliable sources
Where do our source guidelines say that we need to have first-hand sources rather than third-party ones? You are removing sourced information, please stop. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:41, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Eagles247. Your recent edit to the page Trae Waynes appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  12:32, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
thanks for fixing that thing on the sylvester stallone page. i didn't notice you got it until now or id have said thanks earlier. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DragonJoeWyrm (talk • contribs) 15:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)