User talk:Dmartyn

Image tagging for Image:Photo5.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Photo5.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Nonsense articles
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Salto Blonde. Your test worked, and has been or will soon be removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 07:18, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 07:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

JERKS
How is a first warning a last warning suddenly? How am I supposed to write anything for your psuedo-informational enclyclopedia if I am afraid of it instantly being taken off, and myself being barred for vandalism? If you think this is some kind of "true" form of information, and not a biased form of free information, you are lost in the shallow waters of power you have been given.

Regarding your edit summaries and this header; Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

So this forum is not only a control on information by personal opinions of those with the power, but a control on emotional response as well? It is a good system you have going, you can offend anyone you like, in the name of 'true' information, and if they are unhappy all you need to do to defend yourself is to block them completely. It sounds like a great system of free information to me. Stay Calm, --Dmartyn 04:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)