User talk:Dmirabito12

Hi!
Hi! It's Ryan! From class! We literally just talked to each other! Haze2332 (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Dmirabito12, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please complete the student training, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Yu_Mirabito_P3
Major Points Overall, the organization of the sections and subsections is logical and most of the sections provide sufficient information on the topic. The introduction gives a good brief description on what defaunation is and how it occurs. The different causes and drivers of defaunation are nicely separated into subsections, making the article easier to understand and follow compared to the original page. More information could be provided in the section “Global patterns” to explain how the tropical regions are impacted by defaunation.

Minor Points The language used is appropriate for Wikipedia. However, some of the wording could be fixed to further improve the article. For example, the sentence “In extinct animal species for which the cause of extinction is known, over half were affected by invasive species, and for 20% invasive species are the only cited cause of extinction.” under the "Invasive Species" section could be made more clear and concise. Yu.ste (talk) 21:18, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Henderson_Mirabito_P3
Major Points The organization of this article is definitely improved. Good choice with getting rid of the indirect and direct causes; there wasn’t clear criteria on how those categories are different. Removing the references to specific studies was also a good choice- this wasn't appropriate for the article. The introduction is concise, and the following paragraphs show a good depth of information. The section on marine defaunation could use a bit of expanding, even though the effects are less intense. One option is to provide a case study, like was presented in the 'Overexplotation' section.

Minor Points There were no noticeable issues with grammar. The term ‘neotropical’ in the introduction should be defined, and could be a good topic to discuss while expanding the 'Global Patterns'section. If you decide to add a 'See Also' section after publishing, you might want to link to pages about species that have been affected by defaunation. Also, the last sentence in the "Consequences of marine defaunation" section needs a citation.

(I apologize for my draft not being finished. I've been having a lot of difficulty finding information on my topic...which is probably why it's a stub. I will let you know when I have expanded it.) Guyana67 (talk) 22:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Defaunation
The article lacked a WikiProject tag, so there was no place to do the assessment. I tagged it for two projects that I thought would be applicable - Ecology and Extinction. I have it a quick assessment in terms of importance and quality, but I would strongly encourage you to go back, take a look at the criteria, and re-tag the article based on how you think it should be ranked. (It's is perfectly acceptable for you to rank your own contributions.) Thanks for asking me. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:54, 1 December 2015 (UTC)