User talk:Dmitryp123

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 16:42, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sro23 (talk) 16:44, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Spam disguised as references are still considered spam. Also, you were edit warring big time.  Ian.thomson (talk) 17:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are interested in contributing positively, using professionally published mainstream academic or journalistic sources (instead of commercial sources), go ahead and file an unblock request. Do not try to blame Sro23 or Mean as Custard (they were in the right here).  Do not try to argue that the website you were citing wasn't a commercial site or that we don't really have a problem with it.  Ian.thomson (talk) 17:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

I don't understand
Ian I don't understand

I see other companies like laserplasticwelding.com and lpkfusa adding their websites. More than that Laserplasticwelding.com even has Plastic welding keyword right inside the link in the body of the text. I am adding our website as a reference on the bottom. Is it the plastic laser welding keyword that's bothering you? If you would like I can put simply CMS Laser as a reference.

How is my

Most of the links in Reference section go to commercial websites. Also the ones in Further Reading.
 * Looks like someone's taken care of that. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 04:25, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

You really did not need to ban me you know. I was just following example that was already on the page.

(Now removed) mistakes by others do not justify further mistakes by you. Commercial links are not appropriate references. if multiple editors who know more about this site than you are telling you to stop doing something, you should stop until you know what you're doing. You are going to have to accept and admit that you screwed up if you're going to have any hope of being unblocked. Polite ignorance will not get you unblocked: you must demonstrate that you know what you did wrong and let us know how you will avoid making those same mistakes in the future. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)