User talk:Dmkazich

Speedy deletion nomination of Western Michigan University Marching Band


A tag has been placed on Western Michigan University Marching Band, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:30, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Western Michigan Univeristy Marching Band, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tim Allen, you may be blocked from editing. Denniss (talk) 09:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tim Allen.  General Ization Talk  21:54, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:14, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The only reason I have not blocked you indefinitely is because of a single, constructive edit you made eight days ago. Everything else is garbage.  I would recommend that any further vandalism result in an indefinite block per WP:NOTHERE.   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 22:16, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, I'm not sure what your issue is with Tim Allen, but it isn't Wikipedia's issue, and I suggest you deal with it elsewhere. His drug conviction (for possession, not for trafficking) in the late 1970s is already covered in the article.  It has nothing to do with the reasons for his notability, which is what does and should appear in the lead of the article.  General Ization  Talk  22:26, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

February 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Capital punishment in Belarus, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 19:57, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 20:25, 4 February 2020 (UTC)