User talk:Dmm1169/Archives/2023/November

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Temple News Today
Hello. Given your latest message on my talk page, I wanted to let you know that I have been able to update the St. George Utah and Manti Utah Temples as a result of today's temple updates. I haven't yet included the site information on the templates for the Toluca Mexico and João Pessoa Brazil Temple templates. I haven't yet done that in view of your message on my talk page. I wanted to make sure I understood what you were trying to tell me correctly. What I got from your message is that the site announcement date and site announcement link parameters are now defunct on the temple templates, and that the information that has traditionally filled those parameters is now to be included in the notes section, with applicable references. Is that correct? Is there anything from your message that I am missing? I will wait to hear back from you before I edit those templates so that I don't mess them up if I am missing anything. Thanks. User:Jgstokes (talk)—We can disagree without becoming disagreeable. 03:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Last I checked, if reference is placed in "dedication_by" or "notes" then it will show on page. If reference is placed in "dedication_link" it will not show in page. This is applicable to announced by, groundbreaking_by,... There has never been a site_announcement_link parameter. When the temples page went to the new format, any "link" parameter became defunct.
 * The "link" parameter did not provide any citation info other than the link itself with no option to provide it. I guess the link function can be revived if it allows the citation template to be used. Thanks - Dmm1169 (talk) 04:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Dmm1169, as you might have noticed, I went ahead and did my best to get the templates updated appropriately. I see you were able to add geographical coordinates for at least one of the two temples in question. I used the notes section to cite the site announcement. I can continue to do so, as that's actually easier than adding extra fields to the template. And if those fields are defunct anyway, listing the information in the notes is something I can handle no problem. I will probably still leave it to you to add the geographic coordinates when you can, as there is no rush to get that information added. Hope all is going well with your new job and calling. User:Jgstokes (talk)—We can disagree without becoming disagreeable. 04:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * , I haven't added the coordinates yet for either temple. Hopefully next week I'll have the time to add these coordinates/update new stakes Dmm1169 (talk) 05:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries, and again, no rush. Thanks. User:Jgstokes (talk)—We can disagree without becoming disagreeable. 05:20, 30 November 2023 (UTC)