User talk:Dmoloney

Edit summary
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. The Ogre (talk) 17:23, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Battle of Cyrrhestica has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. JCutter (talk) 00:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Battle of Cyrrhestica. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 00:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

If you wish to delete the page you created please use WP:CSD
Please simply put the tag at the top of the page, rather than simply blanking the page. Thanks JCutter (talk) 00:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Multiple tests
Please consider using WP:SANDBOX for your article until it is ready. Thanks. JCutter (talk) 00:17, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

size of the roman empire
Does Parker by any chance tell how he came up with the 6.5 million figure or where he got it ftom? His figure seems somewhat high compared to other sources (see also the discussion page for the roman empire on that). regards--Kmhkmh (talk) 00:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Comparison between Roman and Han Empires (2nd nomination)
You are invited to join the discussion at AFD for Comparison between Roman and Han Empires, since you have are a contributor to the article. Ikip (talk) 01:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Again
Again, there is another IP who changed the result of the Third Anglo-Afghan War from "minor" to "major" victory for the Afghans. You need to revert. 207.233.70.78 (talk) 16:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

List of largest empires
Hi there. We're having a content dispute at the article above - the list of empires has a large 216 entries, and currently the article sees fit to repeat this list 6 times! Clearly a waste of storage and bandwidth. A better solution (saving at least 30% and making it much easier to read and use) would be a table with a column for each attribute, sortable, as used in many other articles (see the discussion). However, a silent editor keeps reverting attempts to clean up the article, without explanation. Please see the discussion (currently nobody disagrees). Your comments would be welcome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.18.207 (talk) 21:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)