User talk:Dmoses816

February 2017
Hello, I'm Toddst1. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Rodney Frelinghuysen ‎ seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Will Carroll, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Toddst1 (talk) 21:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Rodney Frelinghuysen. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 00:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Quis separabit? 16:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

FYI
These links may be interesting:,. Yours, Quis separabit?  19:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

ANI Result
This is to let you know that no evidence was found indicating any misconduct on your part and the ANI discussion has been closed accordingly. Thank you for your contributions to the project. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)