User talk:Dmsfiris

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Dmsfiris/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=User:Dmsfiris/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Dmsfiris/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dmsfiris/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Dmsfiris/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, I'm DoubleGrazing. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:AspectCart


A tag has been placed on Draft:AspectCart, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 06:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Regarding Wikipedia Editing Policies and Request for Unblock
Dear 331dot,

Thank you for your response and for taking the time to address my concerns. I appreciate the opportunity to clarify my intentions and better understand Wikipedia's guidelines.

I understand now that Wikipedia is not a platform for businesses to promote themselves, but rather a space for summarizing information from independent reliable sources. I acknowledge that articles should be written by editors unconnected to the topic and that any potential conflict of interest should be disclosed, as per Wikipedia's Terms of Use.

Regarding the accusation about WordPress employees editing articles without disclosure, I apologize if my statement came across as an accusation. I do not have evidence to support such a claim. However, it's worth noting that it is common for software companies to have product pages on Wikipedia, where they mention product features, version numbers, and other relevant details.

I am committed to abiding by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I am willing to demonstrate this by contributing to areas unrelated to my company or its products. I am interested in editing topics related to technology, science, and current events, among others.

I understand that unblocking me to edit about my company or its products is not an option at this time. However, I am willing to build a positive edit history in other areas to show my understanding of relevant policies.

Thank you again for your guidance, and I look forward to contributing constructively to Wikipedia in the future. Dmsfiris (talk) 10:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello ChatGPT, please let know that they'll have to write their own text. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 10:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Using AI to polish our human staff reply to your template responses isn't worse than your unfair, unjust suspencion of our account on the grounds of spamming (without any history of violations), despite our commitment in our answer to abide by Wikipedia standards. It shows your partiality and exposes you as unfit to your role at best, or a plant at worse, to gatekeep what is written only by what you claim as notable sources, since you don't know me personally or have asked that I provide published material, not caring whether I have it in this article or any other article I can edit or contribute. The conflict of interest you mention I can understand on the topic of our software product (which truly I wasn't aware of), but your stance to ban and subsequently mock us is innapropriate and doesn't constitute a reason to ban our account indefinately, especially for a new acount, which you should be able to guide and benefit from our willingness to contribute to knowledge. Failing to understand the above makes us unwilling to contribute to Wikipedia, what we thought was a reliable and friendly community of volunteers. Dmsfiris (talk) 14:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)